I What´s the cosmic ray's energy dependence?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter morenopo2012
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
morenopo2012
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
i read that the cosmic rays are almost at the velocity of the light, therefore, if they are relativistic their energy it is expressed as

E = (p2c2 + m02c4)½

if the cosmic rays have a spectrum energy from 109 GeV to 1021 GeV

the difference between a proton with an energy of 109 and another one with an energy of 1021 it depends only of the momentum? and if it does, How is this possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
morenopo2012 said:
How is this possible?
What do you mean? It's possible since you are working in the relativistic limit.
 
morenopo2012 said:
i read that the cosmic rays are almost at the velocity of the light, therefore, if they are relativistic their energy it is expressed as

E = (p2c2 + m02c4)½

if the cosmic rays have a spectrum energy from 109 GeV to 1021 GeV

the difference between a proton with an energy of 109 and another one with an energy of 1021 it depends only of the momentum? and if it does, How is this possible?
m0 and c are constant, so only p can vary to get variable E.
 
morenopo2012 said:
the difference between a proton with an energy of 109 and another one with an energy of 1021 it depends only of the momentum? and if it does, How is this possible?
Yes, it depends only on the momentum. Obviously you have "slow" and "fast" protons. The difference between those is their origin (how they are produced and accelerated to those energies). For example low-energetic protons (from the whole spectrum of CRs), originate mainly from the Sun (they are produced and accelerated in the same way solar winds do). The mechanism that leads to accelerating particles to the ultra-high-energy-cosmic-rays (UHECR) regime is not 100% understood and it may not be just a single one (e.g. some can come from neutron stars -although the neutron stars are not that many- , or they can be accelerated by Supernovae etc)...
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top