What should be a very simple optics question is giving me problems (two lenses)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a GRE optics problem involving two converging lenses and the calculation of the final image location. The initial approach to find the image from the first lens and use it as the object for the second lens led to incorrect conclusions, particularly regarding the treatment of object distances. The correct method involves recognizing the image from the first lens as a virtual object for the second lens, requiring a negative object distance. After reevaluating the calculations, the correct final image location was determined to be 5 cm to the right of the second lens. The participant successfully resolved their confusion by reassessing their approach.
FatCat0
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I'm studying for the GREs, and I ran across this problem:

Object located at x=0
Lens 1 located at x=40cm
Lens 2 located at x=70cm (30cm from lens 1)

f1 = 20cm
f2 = 10cm

Both lenses are converging, thin lenses. So I have to find the final image location.

The understanding I have of multiple lens problems is that you find the image from the first lens and treat that as the object for the second lens. I'm guessing this approach is wrong because it's leading to nonsensical answers:

\frac{1}{f1} = \frac{1}{o} + \frac{1}{i}

\frac{1}{20} = \frac{1}{40} + \frac{1}{i}

\frac{2}{40} - \frac{1}{40} = \frac{1}{i}

40 = i = o' (this is 10 cm to the right of the second lens; on the focal point which means that I'm going to get the second image at x=-infinity)

\frac{1}{f2} = \frac{1}{o'} + \frac{1}{i'}

\frac{1}{10} = \frac{1}{40-30} + \frac{1}{i'}

\frac{1}{10} - \frac{1}{10} = \frac{1}{i'}

i' = infinity

The answer is actually i' = 5 cm to the right of the second lens. I have no idea how to get to this though. Where'd I go amiss?
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
FatCat0 said:
The answer is actually i' = 5 cm to the right of the second lens. I have no idea how to get to this though. Where'd I go amiss?
Since the image is 10 cm to the right of the second lens, it must be treated as a virtual object: Use an object distance = -10 cm (not + 10 cm, which would represent a real object 10 cm to the left of the lens).
 
That fixes the side (thank you), but won't that still result in +infinity as the location of the final image?

Edit: Nevermind, I actually redid it and realized that I jumped the gun. That worked, thanks!
 
Last edited:
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top