What are some recommended books for learning more about the science behind QED?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PeteyCoco
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qed
AI Thread Summary
To effectively learn the science behind Feynman's "QED," it's essential to first study non-relativistic quantum mechanics, with recommendations including David Griffiths' "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" and J. J. Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics." After grasping quantum mechanics, a deeper understanding of advanced electromagnetism is necessary, with Griffiths' EM book suggested as a starting point. For quantum field theory, texts like Srednicki, Ryder, and Peskin & Schroeder are recommended over Zee's book. Engaging with foundational concepts in quantum mechanics is crucial, as it requires a significant shift in understanding nature. This structured approach will provide a solid foundation for further studies in quantum field theory.
PeteyCoco
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
I just finished reading QED and now I want to learn the science behind what Feynman talks about. In the introduction by A. Zee, he mentions his book "Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell", saying that it is the next step for someone interested in learning more. I went to a bookstore, looked at the first chapter, and realized that it was above my level. What books would be good for me? For reference, I've taken an intro to mechanics and electromagnetism along with the entire calculus course progression, (I can deal with the math in most books, it's the science I need to learn). I hope this is the right place to be asking this!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you'll want to do quantum mechanics before tackling quantum field theory. I liked "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by David Griffiths. You can take a look at the textbook section (https://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=224 ) to see some other possibilities and what PF members think of them. After QM, you will need to learn electromagnetism at a more advanced level as a classical field theory. Recommending a book for this is not so easy. Griffiths' EM book, which I also like, introduces it towards the end, which makes for a start at least.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
After studying QED and it's perturbative treatment I would continue with non-abelian gauge theory, especially QCD, and non-perturbative phenomena.
 
I can only agree that you first should study non-relativistic quantum mechanics, before you go over to relativistic quantum field theory. You need to learn the concepts of quantum mechanics. The math is not so difficult. If you mastered classical electromagnetism, you are well prepared for the beginning of a quantum-mechanics course, using the wave-mechanics approach, which I think still is the best way to introduce quantum mechanics.

The problem with learning (and also teaching!) quantum theory is that it requires to rethink the whole picture about nature completely. Against this the already unusual features about relativistic space-time, which is more about physics in general, including classical (i.e., non-quantum) physics, is easy.

I don't know the book by Griffiths, but what I know from his writings in Am. J. Physics (if this is the same Griffiths ;-)), I guess he must write good textbooks.

My favorite for beginners is J. J. Sakurai's Modern Quantum mechanics, followed by S. Weinberg's brand-new book. Then one should also have a look at either Ballentine's book or his Review of Modern Physics article on the Minimal Statistical Representation.

For those, interested in the foundational problems of quantum mechanics, I recommend the very "down-to-earth" and carefully written book by A. Peres, Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods.

The latter is not necessary, however, for quantum field theory. There are many good books on the market. Zee's book for sure is not among them, I'm sorry to say. On an introductory level, I'd rather recommend Srednicky, Ryder, or Peskin&Schroeder. The best books on the subject are Weinbergs three volumes "The quantum theory of fields".
 
Great! Thanks everyone for your responses, this should be enough for me to start on.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...

Similar threads

Back
Top