What significance does brownian motion has to do with coal explosion?

AI Thread Summary
Brownian motion refers to the random movement of particles in a fluid due to collisions with fast-moving atoms or molecules. While it is a small-scale phenomenon typically observable under a microscope, its relevance to coal explosions is questioned, as larger scale effects like ventilation and convection are more significant in coal dust movement. The discussion raises concerns about the behavior of gas, particularly methane, under hydrostatic pressure in coal seams and how changes in pressure could affect gas flow. The impact of particle size on explosion hazards is noted, with finer dust posing a greater risk due to increased surface area. Overall, the relationship between Brownian motion and coal explosions remains unclear, with emphasis on larger-scale dynamics.
SecretOfnumber
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Apparently :

What significance does brownian motion has to do with coal explosion?[Brownian motion or pedesis is the presumably random moving of particles suspended in a fluid (a liquid or a gas) resulting from their bombardment by the fast-moving atoms or molecules in the gas or liquid.]

Now I wish to know if This movement has anything to do with gas explosion?(Underground mining)
And does this motion happens under pressure in a coal seam?...briefly:

does gas show same property underground?(pressure,fluid,heat)And what techniques could speed it up?

Cheers,
SON
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Brownian motion is a small scale effect, typically you need a microscope to observe it. I suspect movement of coal dust is likely to be dominated by larger scale effects such as ventilation or convestion?
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coal_dust_explosion

has some interesting discussion but no mention of Brownian motion...

... Dust is defined as powders with particles less than about 500 micrometres in diameter, but finer dust will present a much greater hazard than coarse particles by virtue of the larger total surface area of all the particles...
 
CWatters said:
Brownian motion is a small scale effect, typically you need a microscope to observe it. I suspect movement of coal dust is likely to be dominated by larger scale effects such as ventilation or convestion?


Thanks
Just wondering how small?(in scale) with coal seam under hydrostatic pressure what could be changed ?imagine a 10 meters thickness of coal (in a range of 10 kilometers) 400 meters under surface, what could we expect to see when many things ,including hydrostatic pressure changes ?and gas(ch4)starts to flow?

Cheers
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top