What Software Is Best for Simulating Particle Trajectories in 3D?

AI Thread Summary
For simulating particle trajectories in 3D, Matlab is recommended for its ease of use and built-in graphing functions, especially for a small number of particles. C++ and Fortran are suggested for larger simulations due to their speed, as they are compiled languages with less overhead. While Matlab simplifies setup and coding, C and Fortran can offer better performance for extensive simulations, though they lack built-in graphing capabilities. Specialized codes exist for tracing charged particles in magnetic optics, which can handle complex effects like space charge. Overall, the choice of software depends on the user's familiarity and the scale of the simulation required.
strokebow
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I use a numerical method to trace trajectories of particles. I want to program a sort of 'video' type graph. A graph or 3d video or perhaps just 3 graphs (xy, xz, and yz) that would show the position of the ion as the software is run.

So my question is this...

What software would people recommend for doing this? Can I just use C++? Should I use matlab? or is there some other software where this can be achieved quite straightforwardly without having to write tonnes of code to do the display?

Any ideas?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you already know Matlab? Do you already know C++? Easier to use what you know--the equations will be the same in any case.
Then, it depends on how efficient it needs to be. For a few particles, you might just use Matlab, because the set up is a lot easier, and you can use built in graphing functions. For 10 million particles, you might want to use c or fortran, just for speed.

If you don't know, I recommend just using Matlab, since it's easy and won't take much code.
 
Ok cool.

Its just a case of which has the easier to user graphing functions.

But you think C maybe faster? Whys that?
 
c is (much) faster than Matlab because it is a compiled language and has static typing and minimal software protections. Fortran can be faster than c sometimes, because there's even less imposed structure on function calls.

Neither have any sort of built in graphing routines, though.
 
There are special computer codes for tracing charged particles through magnetic optics, even when there are strong space-charge forces that can defocus the beam.

This one (1998) for beams claims to include space charge effects.

http://accelconf.web.cern.ch/accelconf/pac97/papers/pdf/8p085.pdf

uses the long standing TRANSPORT and TURTLE codes (see references).

This one uses Fortran 90

http://accelconf.web.cern.ch/AccelConf/l06/PAPERS/TUP079.PDF

I have written simple ray racing codes for charged particles in magnetic optics using TRUE BASIC. A simple plotting subroutine might be a short as 20 lines.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top