What Steepest Slope Can a Train Climb Without Slipping on Frosty Rails?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cd19
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Slipping Slope
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the steepest slope a train can climb without slipping on frosty rails, given a coefficient of friction of 0.1. Participants explore the relationship between frictional force and gravitational force on an incline, noting that the maximum friction force must equal the gravitational force for the train to ascend without slipping. The calculated frictional angle is approximately 5.71 degrees, which translates to a slope expressed as "1 in 10." Emphasis is placed on the importance of reading the problem carefully to understand the required answer format. The conversation highlights the intersection of physics concepts and precise communication in problem-solving.
cd19
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The coefficient of friction between the trains wheel's and the rail on a frosty day is 0.1, What is the steepest slope (expressed in the form ''1 in n'') that the train can climb without slipping.

train.jpg



Homework Equations



Ff = μ(Fn)

The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea. Don't want a solution, just a little guidance would be much appreciated. I understand that the point where the train will begin to slip is when the maximum friction force is reached but I can't see how to apply this to this question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK. You've got the force of friction.

If it's on an incline what force must it at least match in order to go uphill?
 
The force must be at least equal to the natural force. what I've attempted so far, I found the frictional angle to be 5.71o, by tan-1(0.1*N/N). now I'm lost.
 
cd19 said:
The force must be at least equal to the natural force. what I've attempted so far, I found the frictional angle to be 5.71o, by tan-1(0.1*N/N). now I'm lost.

The statement says:
(expressed in the form ''1 in n'')

Maybe they just want it as a 1 in 10 rise or more precisely as a rise of 1 /(102 + 1)1/2 = 1 in 10.05 rise?
 
LowlyPion said:
The statement says:

Maybe they just want it as a 1 in 10 rise or more precisely as a rise of 1 /(102 + 1)1/2 = 1 in 10.05 rise?

That would make sense, as the answer I think is 57o, but just out of curiosity how did u come to that conclusion, as it is not in the question do u just have to assume this. Freshmen to physics so excuse my ignorance if i am missing something obvious. Thanks for your help by the way.
 
cd19 said:
That would make sense, as the answer I think is 57o, but just out of curiosity how did u come to that conclusion, as it is not in the question do u just have to assume this. Freshmen to physics so excuse my ignorance if i am missing something obvious. Thanks for your help by the way.

Your 5.7° answer is correct of course. I was merely noting the form that they want the answer in.

Physics is also a matter of English when it comes to supplying the answer in the right form.

So how did I come to the conclusion ...? I guess I'd say it is a careful reading of the problem. As much as anything your course may encourage you to read with precision every bit as much as understanding equations.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top