What Surface Do Null Rays Form in a Modified Minkowski Space?

adsquestion
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
in Minkowksi, the set of all possible null rays from a point defines a cone (light cone).

Now imagine I change the signature of Minkowski from (-,+,+,+) to (-,-,+,+) i.e. a space with two timelike directions and a metric ##ds^2=-dx_1^2-dx_2^2+dx_3^2+dx_4^2##. What kind of surface would the set of null rays form? Is it still a cone? Or is it something else?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How would you go about showing that the set of possible null-rays forms a cone in the regular metric?
 
Simon Bridge said:
How would you go about showing that the set of possible null-rays forms a cone in the regular metric?
Probably by noting that possible null trajectories have ##ds^2=0## and by differentiating with respect to the affine parameter, we see this corresponds to ##x_1^2=x_2^2+x_3^2+x_4^2## (working with Minkowski at the moment). This can be recognised as the equation of a cone (really a 4d hypercone I suppose).

Now for the case at hand we'd arrive at something like ##x_1^2+x_2^2=x_3^2+x_4^2## and I'm not sure how to interpret this? Would there be an apex in two of the directions?
 
Writing it ##x_1^2 = - x_2^2 + x_3^2+x_4^2## may help.
 
fresh_42 said:
Writing it ##x_1^2 = - x_2^2 + x_3^2+x_4^2## may help.
so it's like a "hyper-hyperboloid"? it looks like each choice of ##x_1## gives a different shaped hyperboloid.
 
I'm not quite sure for my imagination of 4-d objects isn't very well. But to illustrate the light cone you already contracted two space dimensions to one, i.e. the light cone is actually the shape of emerging circles ##x_1^2 =x_2^2+x_3^2## of radius ##x_1 ∈ [0,∞[ ##. Applying the same here would give us ##x_1^2 = - x_2^2 + x_3^2## with ##x_1 ∈ [0,∞[ ##, a hyperboloid. At least this is my understanding of the situation.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top