What the minimum mass for a habitable exoplanet or moon?

AI Thread Summary
The minimum mass for a habitable exoplanet or moon is estimated to be slightly over half of Earth's mass, necessary to retain a sufficient atmosphere and liquid water. Super Earths, with masses between 2 to 10 times that of Earth, are considered capable of supporting thick atmospheres and plate tectonics. The exoplanet 5r7a4br-Xm7, significantly larger and more massive than Earth, shows potential for intelligent life, possibly due to its high rotational rate mitigating gravitational effects. Discussions also touch on the limitations of understanding life forms, as exemplified by the analogy of fish and their comprehension of water. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of defining habitability in the context of varying planetary conditions.
cosmicrock
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
So I've read that super Earth's masses 2-10 can be habitable hold thick atmosphere and generate plate tectonics. So I am wondering the absolute minimum mass an exoplanet or moon can be to stay habitable in the liquid H2O zone? I guess these would be called subEarth's.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It would probably take a little over 1/2 Earth mass to retain sufficient atmosphere and liquid water to support a biosystem.
 
Interesting question, considering the exoplanet 5r7a4br-Xm7 (Xavier-Levinson-7c), while approximately 40 times the diameter of Earth, and estimated to be 20~25 times more massive, shows strong evidence of supporting intelligent life. It's theorized the high rotational rate (approximately 32hr) offsets the strong gravitation enough to provide for what we could call "normal" life processes. Of course this data is being collected from Earth, and there is no way to know for certain if life exists on such a place.
 
The second quote concerning the fish is absurd. A fish cannot comprehend anything other than it's search for food. Even if it could comprehend 'water', there would be no way to detect if it were capable of comprehending such, as we have no process to communicate with fish. Therefore, the fish quote is ridiculous, and absurd.
 
Smashinz_1885 said:
The second quote concerning the fish is absurd. A fish cannot comprehend anything other than it's search for food. Even if it could comprehend 'water', there would be no way to detect if it were capable of comprehending such, as we have no process to communicate with fish. Therefore, the fish quote is ridiculous, and absurd.

That's his signature, it's in all his posts. Don't take it so seriously!
 
I'm still working on my 'glub glub' translation skills.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top