What the wave function exactly mean?

angadaria
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
hi guys, i wanted to know what the wave function exactly mean?and what is the physical interpretation of wave function?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


angadaria said:
hi guys, i wanted to know what the wave function exactly mean?

The "absolute square" of the wave function, \psi^*\psi (keep in mind the wave function is generally complex, not real), is the probability density for finding a particle at a particular location. The probability of finding the particle in a particular region of space is

P = \int {\psi^*\psi} dxdydz

where the limits of integration specify the boundaries of the region.

and what is the physical interpretation of wave function?

There is a lot of disagreement about this, and several different viable theories about the interpretation of the wave function. Unfortunately, it is not possible to distinguish between these interpretations because they all predict the same results for experiments that we can actually (even in principle) perform.
 


thanks for the reply...what do we mean when we say \Psi (x,t)?
 


angadaria said:
what do we mean when we say \Psi (x,t)?

The wave function depends on position and time. To expand on my answer a bit, the probabilty that a particle is located in a certain region of space varies with time, in general:

P(t) = \int {\Psi^*(x,t) \Psi(x,t) dx

(ignoring the y and z dimensions)
 


In nonrelativistic mechanics, x and t are independent variables in the sense that a point P in a 1-D configuration's space is parametrized by the coordinate x at any value of time "t". In Quantum Mechanics, x is promoted to an observable (actually t can be promoted to an observable, too, but this is not universally accepted, so it's not really textbook material) and its spectral values can be used to parametrize the space of wavefunctions. The <t> is a parameter as well.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
693
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top