Studying What to purchase with this textbook

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jared Schuler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Textbook
AI Thread Summary
Purchasing "An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics" may be premature without a solid foundation in calculus and physics, as many sections require advanced mathematical knowledge. It's advised to first acquire introductory textbooks in calculus and physics to better prepare for the complexities of the astrophysics text. The discussion highlights that spending over $200 on a college-level textbook without the necessary prerequisites could lead to frustration and confusion. Alternative astronomy books that are less math-intensive are suggested for those not yet ready for advanced material. Overall, focusing on foundational subjects before tackling advanced texts is recommended for a smoother learning experience.
Jared Schuler
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am interested in purchasing An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics (2nd edition) off of Amazon. Many reviews have praised the depth and detailed and the fact that it replaced a ten-year old edition, but I was caught offguard by one reviewer that recommended the reader have knowledge of introductory physics and mathematics equations as well as diffe q (differential equations).

I am pondering if I should purchase this massive book alone and avoid using over $200 on college textbooks when I haven't even started senior year yet OR if I should be safe and purchase some introductory calculus and physics textbooks with it to make the trip a bit easier for me.

If you would recommend that I purchase introductory calculus textbooks are there any that YOU could personally recommend? Please keep in mind that I am good at math but I usually require teacher aid in learning it before I master it easily.

As well what sort of introductory physics textbooks would you recommend to prepare me for the BOB (Big Orange Book)

Thank you very very much :) :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jared Schuler said:
I am interested in purchasing An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics (2nd edition) off of Amazon. Many reviews have praised the depth and detailed and the fact that it replaced a ten-year old edition, but I was caught offguard by one reviewer that recommended the reader have knowledge of introductory physics and mathematics equations as well as diffe q (differential equations).

I am pondering if I should purchase this massive book alone and avoid using over $200 on college textbooks when I haven't even started senior year yet OR if I should be safe and purchase some introductory calculus and physics textbooks with it to make the trip a bit easier for me.

If you would recommend that I purchase introductory calculus textbooks are there any that YOU could personally recommend? Please keep in mind that I am good at math but I usually require teacher aid in learning it before I master it easily.

As well what sort of introductory physics textbooks would you recommend to prepare me for the BOB (Big Orange Book)

Thank you very very much :) :)
It's not clear why you want to purchase this text or what your present level of mathematical knowledge is, but if you are talking about purchasing introductory calculus books, it would suggest that your purchase of an Astrophysics text is a bit premature. Same goes for the physics. If you have not studied any physics, you're going to be lost trying to make sense of the more technical sections of this book.

This is a $200 college textbook, so IDK how you are saving any money.

IMO, learn calculus and differential equations before paying out $200 for a book which will likely be a puzzle to you. Same with physics.

If you want a book on astronomy (which doesn't have as much math to tackle), there are other books written for a non-specialized audience.
 
This is the book by Carroll and Ostlie, right? Professors and students normally think of textbooks using their authors' names rather than their titles.

If so, and you are a high-school student who has not yet studied any calculus or physics, I think much of this book will be over your head, even though I've never used it myself. The usual prerequisites for an upper-level undergraduate physics course such as one this book is apparently intended for are:

1. two semesters of calculus-based introductory physics using a textbook such as Halliday/Resnick/Walker "Fundamentals of Physics" or similar textbooks by Young/Freedman, Tipler/Mosca, Serway, etc.

2. three semesters of calculus, through multivariable (vector) calculus.

3. possibly also an introductory course in differential equations. I don't know whether it would be easy to skip over the heavy differential equations in this book.

You can find a lot of discussion of textbooks for these prerequisite courses next door in our Science and Math Textbooks forum.
 
Imo spending $200 on a textbook that isn't required is lunacy :)
There are plenty of resources online for learning physics + astrophysics
If you really want to buy a text try to find a less expensive one... You would definitely regret buying a $200 book that doesn't work out
 
Jared Schuler said:
when I haven't even started senior year

Do you mean senior year in high school, or senior year in university? jtbell and I suspect that you mean senior year in high school. In any case, why does your Physics Forums information page say that you have a Ph.D. in astrophysics?
 
TL;DR Summary: What topics to cover to safely say I know arithmetic ? I am learning arithmetic from Indian NCERT textbook. Currently I have finished addition ,substraction of 2 digit numbers and divisions, multiplication of 1 digit numbers. I am moving pretty slowly. Can someone tell me what topics to cover first to build a framework and then go on in detail. I want to learn fast. It has taken me a year now learning arithmetic. I want to speed up. Thanks for the help in advance. (I also...
Hi community My aim is to get into research about atoms, specifically, I want to do experimental research that explores questions like: 1. Why do Gallium/Mercury have low melting points 2. Why are there so many exceptions and inconsistencies when it comes to explaining molecular structures / reaction mechanisms in inorganic and organic chemistry 3. Experimental research about fundamental Quantum Mechanics, such as the one being followed by Hiroshima university that proved that observing...
I am currently in the second (and final) year of my MS in Physics. I've just started my research, which focuses on identifying Dark Matter through Beyond the Standard Model (BSM) extensions. My supervisor has directed me to learn model building using FeynRules and subsequent calculations via MadGraph or other simulators. I've successfully built models for QED and QCD, and I am now working on Weak Interactions, Electroweak theory, and symmetry breaking. My immediate goal for the next few...
Back
Top