What Trajectory Would a Proton Follow Near a Fixed Positively Charged Particle?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the trajectory of a proton near a fixed positively charged particle, exploring the implications of an inverse square centripetal force. It is established that only conic sections are possible orbits, with stable orbits being ellipses. However, in this scenario, the proton's path is expected to be highly sensitive to initial conditions, leading to no bound orbits. The consensus suggests that the trajectory will be a hyperbola, as it aligns with the physical behavior of the proton moving in a straight line far from the charge, curving upon approach, and then returning to a straight path. This understanding highlights the nature of the forces at play in such interactions.
Nabeshin
Science Advisor
Messages
2,207
Reaction score
16
I know it's relatively easy to show that the only possible orbits given an inverse square centripetal force relation are conic sections, of which the only stable orbits are ellipses. However, I was wondering what the situation would be given a centrifugal force (really a misnomer, since it wouldn't follow anything like a circular trajectory) but basically something in a situation like this:

Fixed positively charged particle and proton flying nearby.

In this situation the force is always anti parallel to the radius vector. Obviously there is no bound orbit for this situation, and I'm thinking the type of path is going to be highly sensitive to initial conditions, but before I waste time working over the problem I figure I'd ask if any of you have insight into it (or have done anything similar).

Cheers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Due to the inverse square relationship, I believe it will still be a conic section - in this case, the only sensible one - a hyperbola.

In fact, a hyperbola makes good physical sense here. Far away, the thing moves in a straight line, then when it collides it has a large curvature, then it quickly gets back down to "asymptotic", straight-line behavior.

That's my guess.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top