What Triggers the Electron's Change in the Double Slit Experiment?

mizpah12
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi! :smile:
I’m new here and enjoying it very much.
In the double slit experiment; what causes the fired electron to change from being in a wave configuration, back to a particle configuration when it strikes the target?
Mizpah
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mizpah12 said:
Hi! :smile:
I’m new here and enjoying it very much.
In the double slit experiment; what causes the fired electron to change from being in a wave configuration, back to a particle configuration when it strikes the target?
Mizpah

The electron is neither in a particle state, nor a wave configuration, until it is observed. If you try to observe the electron while it is in flight:

1) Trying to observe the electron as a particle will measure that the electron is a particle, hence no interference pattern.
2) Trying to observe the electron as a wave will measure that the electron is a wave, hence we get an interference pattern.

Don't you just :!) how much confusion this simple experiment can generate?

-Dan

Sorry, I should have mentioned that I am presuming that we are observing the electron at one of the slits.
 
I think he meant when the elctron strikes the detector. Let's assume that's the case.

This a crazy thing man: the wavefunction never collapses if you didn't ascertain which slit the particle went through! The electron exhibits particle behaviour, having struck at a point, and yet over many electron observations you can only explain *where* the electron hit if that same electron *upon striking the the target* is also exhibiting wavelike properties!

So the answer to your question is that the change in "configuration" never happens unless you ascertain which slit the electron must have gone through.
 
I think my brain has started leaking out of my ears. The quantum world, we don't really understand it but we'll be damned if we'll admit it :wink:
 
Schrodinger's Dog said:
I think my brain has started leaking out of my ears. The quantum world, we don't really understand it but we'll be damned if we'll admit it :wink:


On the contrary, the Copenhagen interpretation is based precisely on this admission.

Sorry about extending a profitless thread, Zapper, but I couldn't resist.:redface:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top