What Type of Signal is x(t) in Parseval's Theorem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jiho
  • Start date Start date
Jiho
Messages
20
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


In parseval's theorm, what is type of x(t)?? I mean.. is this voltage wave? or power wave?

Homework Equations


upload_2019-1-14_13-51-29.png


The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-1-14_13-51-29.png
    upload_2019-1-14_13-51-29.png
    3.9 KB · Views: 815
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Mathematically, ##x(t)## can be any function ##x:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{C}## that is any complex valued function over the real line (or as a sub case any real valued function over the real line ##x:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}##) for which its continuous Fourier transform ##X(f)## exists . So it can be a function representing the (complex) voltage between two nodes of a circuit or the power between two nodes of a circuit.

However the usual interpretation of this theorem in signal analysis is that the two sides of the equation are just two different ways of computing the total energy of a signal ##x(t)## (a voltage or a current signal).
 
  • Like
Likes Jiho
you mentioned it doesn't matter that signal x(t) represents voltage or power. But I can't understand if x(t) represent power,
upload_2019-1-17_16-25-52.png
this equation doesn't make sense as I think. In my opinion, How can power^2 be just power?? Unit of dimension is not same as I know.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-1-17_16-23-45.png
    upload_2019-1-17_16-23-45.png
    1.5 KB · Views: 346
  • upload_2019-1-17_16-23-51.png
    upload_2019-1-17_16-23-51.png
    1.5 KB · Views: 352
  • upload_2019-1-17_16-25-52.png
    upload_2019-1-17_16-25-52.png
    1.5 KB · Views: 525
Yes I said that ##x(t)## can be any function for which the Fourier transform exists. However I also said that the usual interpretation is that of energy (the integrals in both sides represent energy) in the case ##x(t)## is a voltage or current signal. If ##x(t)## is a power signal then we can't give that usual interpretation of energy to this theorem.
 
  • Like
Likes Jiho
Back
Top