What uncertainties should I assume when I only know the measured value

AI Thread Summary
To determine propagation uncertainty when only the measured values are known, it is advisable to use half of the least significant digit for each measurement. This approach applies to all variables involved, including mass, voltage, distance, and gravitational acceleration. The precision of the uncertainty should reflect the significant digits of the measurements; for instance, a measurement of 1x10^-15 kg has a larger uncertainty than 1.0x10^-15 kg. Since the simulation program lacks information on uncertainties, consulting the professor for clarification is a prudent step. Establishing the correct uncertainties is crucial for accurate calculations of charge using the equation q = (mgd)/v.
leright
Messages
1,317
Reaction score
19
I need to determine the propagation uncertainty of a calculated quantity (function of the variables mass, acceleration due to gravity, cap plate separation, and voltage), but I do not know the uncertainties of these measurements. I just know the values. What should I take the uncertainty to be? Should I just say +/- 0.5 or +/1 0.1 of the least significant digit? I missed the lab so I didn't actually perform the measurements, and the prof gave me this simulation program of the lab, but the simulation program says nothing about the uncertainties of the measurements.

I am calculating charge from the following equation.

q = (mgd)/v

Examples of the values for the measured data are as follows...

m = 1.x10x-15 kg
v = 125 V
d = 0.01 m
g = 9.81 m/s^2

What should I take the uncertainties to be??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone? this is somewhat urgent.
 
That is the best you can do in such a circumstance - half of the least significant digit for each of the values - also for the gravitational acceleration. Just make sure about the amount of significant digits in each of the measurements because that will determine the magnitude of the uncertainty. Like your mass - a larger uncertainty will result from 1x10^-15 kg than from 1.0X10^-15 kg.
 
andrevdh said:
That is the best you can do in such a circumstance - half of the least significant digit for each of the values - also for the gravitational acceleration. Just make sure about the amount of significant digits in each of the measurements because that will determine the magnitude of the uncertainty. Like your mass - a larger uncertainty will result from 1x10^-15 kg than from 1.0X10^-15 kg.

well, the program shows 1x10^15 kg. I dunno. I will ask the prof tommorow I suppose.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top