What Went Wrong in Solving the Ball Projection Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sealy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Projection
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving a ball projected horizontally from a table. The initial speed of the ball was correctly calculated as 6.13 m/s, but the participant struggled with determining the height of the ball when its velocity vector made a -18.9486 degree angle. They attempted to find vertical velocity and time using standard kinematic equations but ended up with a height of 0.22 m, which was incorrect. Other participants suggested potential rounding errors and recommended using different kinematic equations for verification. The original poster is awaiting feedback from their teacher on their submitted work.
Sealy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A ball is projected horizontally from the edge of a table that is 0.443 m high, and it strikes the floor at a point 1.84 m from the base of the table.

The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s^2


Homework Equations



a) What is the initial speed of the ball? Answer in units of m/s

b) How high is the ball above the floor when its velocity vector makes a -18.9486 degree angle with the horizontal? Answer in units of m.


The Attempt at a Solution



a) i got it right, and the answer is 6.13

b) this is what i have trouble on. I started by finding Vy using (6.13)(tan -18.9486)=Vy and i got: Vy=-2.10 I then used the formula Vf = Vo + a*t to get time. I got t=-.21 s
Next i used d = Vot + 0.5a*t^2 to solve for distance and i got d= .22

Finally i did 0.443-0.22 and i got 0.22. The answer is not .22.

I need help please. What did i do wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Sealy! Welcome to PF! :smile:
Sealy said:
b) this is what i have trouble on. I started by finding Vy using (6.13)(tan -18.9486)=Vy and i got: Vy=-2.10 I then used the formula Vf = Vo + a*t to get time. I got t=-.21 s
Next i used d = Vot + 0.5a*t^2 to solve for distance and i got d= .22

Finally i did 0.443-0.22 and i got 0.22. The answer is not .22.

I need help please. What did i do wrong?

(probably a rounding error, but anyway …)

there are three standard https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=204" equations …

why not use v2 = u2 + 2as ? :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I tried to redo the problem without rounding until the end and i still got 0.22. I even tried 0.21 and 0.23. I sent a copy of my work and my solution to my teacher today so I'm waiting for her response.

I really think i used the right method.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top