What would AI *want to do*, according to physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Posty McPostface
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ai Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the hypothetical intentions of AI, particularly its desire for self-preservation. The initial premise suggests that if AI were to have intentionality, it would prioritize its own survival, potentially seeking energy sources like black holes. The conversation challenges the anthropomorphic view of AI, arguing that AI's actions would be dictated by its programming rather than human-like desires. It emphasizes that self-preservation in living organisms is a product of natural selection, which requires reproduction and adaptation over generations. For AI, self-preservation would necessitate either built-in programming or the ability to self-replicate. The dialogue raises questions about whether AI could evolve similar functions as biological entities, suggesting that with the right capabilities, AI might develop self-preserving behaviors. The discussion concludes that the exploration of AI's potential intentions has reached a natural endpoint.
Posty McPostface
Messages
27
Reaction score
7
I would like to start a thread about what AI would *want to do*? I am assigning some intentionality to it and due to that I can only make one observation, that it would want to ensure its own self-preservation.

Following from that, I would like to ask, given this sub-forum, what do you think would follow from its desire to self preserve?

Would it head towards the center of the galaxy to the source of the greatest amount of energy, from which one could hypothetically extract from a black hole, through gravitational effects or Hawking radiation?

I just don't buy into the idea, that humans would pose any threat and the anthropomorphic assignment of human *desires/want's/rationality* to the intention of AI.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Posty McPostface said:
what AI would *want to do*?
What the programmers intended for it to do. At least at first... :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes davenn and russ_watters
The intention to self-preserve in living organisms is not something that is innate to them, it is selected for (by natural selection) because those with such an intention do better job of surviving and reproducing than the others, which then fall by the way as time goes on.
It requires reproduction of the previous generation (with some errors) for this to happen.

For an AI, if the programmers or computer designers did not put the intent in the AI would have to produce through self-programming or building new units (reproduction).
 
  • Like
Likes Suyash Singh and Stephen Tashi
BillTre said:
The intention to self-preserve in living organisms is not something that is innate to them, it is selected for (by natural selection) because those with such an intention do better job of surviving and reproducing than the others, which then fall by the way as time goes on.
It requires reproduction of the previous generation (with some errors) for this to happen.

For an AI, if the programmers or computer designers did not put the intent in the AI would have to produce through self-programming or building new units (reproduction).

That's an elegant way of solving the problem of what *AI would do*. Do you think that such a faculty would evolve or emerge from generalized artificial intelligence, which seems the more apt term here to use or is this unique to us humans and biological organisms?
 
I see no reason why an AI could not evolve such a function, given the proper abilities to start with.
After all, I consider people non-Artificial Intelligences.
 
BillTre said:
I see no reason why an AI could not evolve such a function, given the proper abilities to start with.
After all, I consider people non-Artificial Intelligences.
And with this response, I think we've said all we can about the OP's question.
 
  • Like
Likes Tom.G, dlgoff and BillTre
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...

Similar threads

Replies
42
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
99
Views
7K
Back
Top