What would be the most efficient 1kw motor to use at low RPM

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fizzics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motor Rpm
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on identifying the most efficient 1 kW motor suitable for low RPM applications, specifically focusing on the efficiency of different motor types under various load conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the expected efficiency of a 3-phase motor operating up to 300 RPM under normal conditions with a small load.
  • One participant notes that 3-phase motors are generally more efficient than single-phase motors, citing a range of full load motor efficiencies from 85% to 97% and detailing various motor losses.
  • A later reply clarifies that the original inquiry was indeed about a 3-phase motor.
  • Another participant mentions that brushless motors can achieve efficiencies of up to 98%, suggesting that they can be designed to match the maximum efficiency operating point with the mechanical load.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on motor types and their efficiencies, with no consensus reached on the best option for low RPM applications.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to various motor losses and regulatory influences on motor efficiency, but does not resolve the implications of these factors on specific motor choices.

Fizzics
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
...Up to 300 rpm (3 phase motor) and what sort of efficiency could I expect under normal conditions with a small load? Thanks
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Fizzics said:
...Up to 300 rpm and what sort of efficiency could I expect under normal conditions with a small load? Thanks

I assume you're talking a single phase motor. Too bad, three phase motors are more efficient.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induction_motor#Efficiency
wiki said:
Full load motor efficiency varies from about 85% to 97%, related motor losses being broken down roughly as follows:[39]
  • Friction and windage, 5% – 15%
  • Iron or core losses, 15% – 25%
  • Stator losses, 25% – 40%
  • Rotor losses, 15% – 25%
  • Stray load losses, 10% – 20%.
Various regulatory authorities in many countries have introduced and implemented legislation to encourage the manufacture and use of higher efficiency electric motors. There is existing and forthcoming legislation regarding the future mandatory use of premium-efficiency induction-type motors in defined equipment. For more information, see: Premium efficiency and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Copper_in_energy_efficient_motors&action=edit&redlink=1 .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for your reply - actually i meant to say that it is 3 phase
 
With a brushless motor, 98% efficiency is not unheard of. It can be designed so that max efficiency operating point of the motor matches the mechanical load.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K