What Would Happen If We Turned Off the Sun's Gravity?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Timmulus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the hypothetical scenario of turning off the Sun's gravity and its implications for Earth's orbit. Participants explore the time it would take for Earth to begin to leave its orbit, the nature of gravitational disturbances, and the propagation speed of gravitational waves, touching on theoretical and observational aspects of gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that if the Sun's gravity were turned off, it would take approximately 8 minutes for Earth to begin leaving its orbit, based on the speed of gravitational disturbances traveling at the speed of light.
  • Others express uncertainty about the claim, suggesting that gravitational effects are detected indirectly, which may complicate the understanding of how quickly changes would be felt.
  • It is noted that gravitational waves are predicted to travel at the speed of light, as stated in Einstein's field equations, but some participants question whether this has been experimentally verified.
  • Some participants argue that while gravitational waves have not been directly detected, the theory of General Relativity (GR) has been verified with high precision, leading to a general assumption that gravitational waves travel at light speed.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of gravitational waves, with some participants indicating that they are mathematical predictions based on established theories, while others emphasize the lack of direct experimental evidence for their existence.
  • Participants discuss the implications of potentially incorrect assumptions about the speed of gravitational waves and the need for scientific theories to remain open to modification based on new evidence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the speed of gravitational waves and the implications of turning off the Sun's gravity. While some participants agree on the theoretical basis for gravitational wave propagation, others challenge the certainty of these claims and highlight the lack of experimental verification.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the unresolved status of gravitational wave detection and the dependence on theoretical assumptions in General Relativity. The discussion reflects ongoing debates about the nature of gravity and the implications of current scientific understanding.

Timmulus
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
If you turned off the suns gravity, how long would it take for the Earth to begin to leave it's orbit and why?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Timmulus said:
If you turned off the suns gravity, how long would it take for the Earth to begin to leave it's orbit and why?

Approximately 8 minutes.

Gravitational disturbances travel at the speed of light. The sun is 93 million miles away. This, divided by c (the speed of light) gives a time of around 8 minutes.
 
I am not sure about that, thinking about it if we only detect the affects of gravity indirectly then we would more likely relate them to the indirect information than the actual information.

john
 
jck200 said:
I am not sure about that, thinking about it if we only detect the affects of gravity indirectly then we would more likely relate them to the indirect information than the actual information.
What?

Gravitational waves travel at speed of light, so bluesurge's answer is absolutely correct.
 
bluesurge863 said:
Approximately 8 minutes.

Gravitational disturbances travel at the speed of light. The sun is 93 million miles away. This, divided by c (the speed of light) gives a time of around 8 minutes.

How do we know gravitational disturbances travel at the speed of light?
 
This is stated in Einstein's field equations, and if it was instantaneous than it would violate our fundamental understanding of the universe. Gravitational disturbances are generally very difficult to observe unless you have a super-sensitive apparatus that is focused on analyzing black hole combinations or binary pulsars, this is what LISA (Laser Interferometer Space Antenna) does.
 
Are gravitational affects around black holes different to the rest of the universe?

Sorry not too well up on gravitational waves would that be space waves? How do we detect if the space is creating waves?

If it is mathematical equations or indirect detection I can accept that answer.

john
 
Gravity around black holes appears to follow Einstein's Field Equation.

Gravitational waves are propagating distortions of space-time curvature. Nobody has been yet able to actually detect these. It takes an enormous catastrophic event, such as collapse of a star, to produce gravitational waves strong enough for us to detect, and it would have to happen somewhere relatively close.

So yes, at this stage, they are purely a mathematical prediction, but based on a very well established theory.
 
Kevin_Axion said:
This is stated in Einstein's field equations, and if it was instantaneous than it would violate our fundamental understanding of the universe. Gravitational disturbances are generally very difficult to observe unless you have a super-sensitive apparatus that is focused on analyzing black hole combinations or binary pulsars, this is what LISA (Laser Interferometer Space Antenna) does.

Has our fundamental understanding of the universe ever been violated before?
 
  • #10
K^2 said:
Gravity around black holes appears to follow Einstein's Field Equation.

Gravitational waves are propagating distortions of space-time curvature. Nobody has been yet able to actually detect these. It takes an enormous catastrophic event, such as collapse of a star, to produce gravitational waves strong enough for us to detect, and it would have to happen somewhere relatively close.

So yes, at this stage, they are purely a mathematical prediction, but based on a very well established theory.
So at this stage gravitational waves and the speed at which they travel is unproven?
 
  • #11
Timmulus said:
So at this stage gravitational waves and the speed at which they travel is unproven?
They have not been experimentally verified, but GR itself has been verified by experiment to an incredible precision, so there is absolutely no reason to suspect a different outcome.
 
  • #12
The speed of gravity is currently not known.
As suggested, it is assumed to be at the speed of light, but has not yet been proven.
 
  • #13
pallidin said:
The speed of gravity is currently not known.
As suggested, it is assumed to be at the speed of light, but has not yet been proven.
Speed of light enters Einstein's Field Eqn. If it was wrong, we'd notice, because it would predict wrong orbits for planets. So while we have no experiment to directly measure speed of gravitational waves, we do know that they should travel at the speed of light.
 
  • #14
I think it's safe to say that CURRENTLY our understanding is that gravity waves travel at light speed. If it turns out tomorrow that we were wrong, then so be it. We will have to modify things. We currently just have no reason to assume that they don't travel at light speed.
 
  • #15
The assumption that gravitational waves propagate at the speed of light is at the base of deriving GR equations. These equations are tested to 10-12. I can't say that this can't be false, but the odds of us making a mistake like this and still getting the right answer with that sort of precision are incredibly low.
 
  • #16
K^2 said:
The assumption that gravitational waves propagate at the speed of light is at the base of deriving GR equations. These equations are tested to 10-12. I can't say that this can't be false, but the odds of us making a mistake like this and still getting the right answer with that sort of precision are incredibly low.

If that's the case, I tend to agree.
 
  • #17
Drakkith said:
I think it's safe to say that CURRENTLY our understanding is that gravity waves travel at light speed. If it turns out tomorrow that we were wrong, then so be it. We will have to modify things. We currently just have no reason to assume that they don't travel at light speed.

Your willingness to see GR, SR and everything ever postulated by Einstein as something less than sacrosanct is refreshing. I appreciate your emphasis on the word "CURRENTLY". It shows a mind open to challenge and change, willing to consider alternate possibilities. A good attribute, in my opinion, for a scientific mind to possess. So, assuming gravity waves do exist, do they travel at light speed because, according to GR, nothing can exceed the speed of light? If the speed of light were 187,000 mps would that be the speed at which gravity waves would travel?
 
  • #18
Hi.
We call maximum speed of interaction c as 'speed of light' traditionally. All the massless particles, e.g. photon, graviton travel at the same speed c.
Regards.
 
  • #19
Timmulus said:
So, assuming gravity waves do exist, do they travel at light speed because, according to GR, nothing can exceed the speed of light?
First of all, according to GR speed of light can be exceeded. It only has to be obeyed locally, and that's a huge loophole.

And speed of gravitational wave propagation comes from linearized GR, in which equations for G-field are analogous to Maxwell's equations. The permeability constants for the gravitational and gravitomagnetic fields end up such that the speed of wave propagation is still c.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K