What's a good calculus textbook?

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnnyies
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Textbook
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around recommendations for calculus textbooks suitable for self-study, with a focus on various texts including James Stewart's Calculus, Larson's Calculus with Analytic Geometry, Michael Spivak's Calculus, and Courant's Introduction to Calculus to Analysis. Participants explore the suitability of these books for different levels of understanding and their approaches to teaching calculus concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest James Stewart's Calculus and Larson's Calculus with Analytic Geometry as good options for self-study.
  • Michael Spivak's Calculus is described as an advanced text that serves more as an introduction to analysis rather than a standard calculus book.
  • It is noted that Spivak's Calculus covers only single variable calculus, but at a higher theoretical level than typical introductory texts.
  • Courant's "Introduction to Calculus to Analysis" is mentioned as having two volumes, with Volume 1 covering single variable calculus and Volume 2 covering multivariable calculus.
  • Some participants express a preference for Larson's Calculus over Stewart's, particularly for AP Calculus classes.
  • There is a distinction made between general calculus books like Larson and Stewart, which focus on techniques and applications, and more theoretical texts like Spivak's and Courant's.
  • Concerns are raised about the treatment of epsilon-delta proofs and continuity in various calculus textbooks, with some participants suggesting that these topics are generally weak in many books.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the suitability of various textbooks for beginners versus more advanced learners. There is no consensus on which textbook is definitively better, as preferences vary based on individual needs and backgrounds.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight limitations in the treatment of certain topics, such as epsilon-delta proofs and continuity, but do not resolve these issues or reach a consensus on their significance across different texts.

johnnyies
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
What's a good calculus textbook? Especially for self study. I've narrowed things down to James Stewart's Calculus and Larson's Calculus with Analytic Geometry.

Does anyone know if Michael Spivak's Calculus is only single variable, or does it include multivariable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Michael Spivak's Calculus is an advanced book, more of an introduction to analysis textbook.

I'm currently using Larson's Calculus for my AP Calculus class, and it's not bad. If it boils down to Stewart vs. Larson, I'll go with Larson.
 
Spivak's Calculus covers only single variable calculus (but indeed at a higher, more theoretical level than a typical introduction).
 
thrill3rnit3 said:
Michael Spivak's Calculus is an advanced book, more of an introduction to analysis textbook.

I'm currently using Larson's Calculus for my AP Calculus class, and it's not bad. If it boils down to Stewart vs. Larson, I'll go with Larson.

Are you using Larson's Calculus with Analytic Geometry?

Anyways, how is Spivak's and Courant's texts compared to Larson or Stewart?
 
johnnyies said:
Are you using Larson's Calculus with Analytic Geometry?

Yes I am.

johnnyies said:
Anyways, how is Spivak's and Courant's texts compared to Larson or Stewart?

They're not even comparable. Larson and Stewart are general calculus books, aimed to teach the techniques and the applications of calculus.

Meanwhile, Spivak's and Courant's texts take it a step further - they delve into the theory side of things.

If you're just beginning to learn calculus, don't bother with Spivak's and Courant's just yet.
 
If by "Larson", you mean the Larson & Hostetler book on Calculus with Analytic Geometry, this is a good book. The weak topics are the epsilon-delta limit proofs and the study on continuity; otherwise should be a good book. Reasonable to learn from, for a beginner who wants to have concept understanding and learn to apply Calculus.
 
symbolipoint said:
If by "Larson", you mean the Larson & Hostetler book on Calculus with Analytic Geometry, this is a good book. The weak topics are the epsilon-delta limit proofs and the study on continuity; otherwise should be a good book. Reasonable to learn from, for a beginner who wants to have concept understanding and learn to apply Calculus.

Are the epsilon-delta proofs just generally weak in most calculus books? I though Thomas' Early Transcendentals didn't do so well explaining them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
14K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
20K