Better Textbooks than Griffiths for Particle Physics 101

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying alternative textbooks to Griffiths' "Introduction to Elementary Particles" for an introductory course in particle physics at the undergraduate level. Participants explore various options that may provide a more beneficial or modern approach while remaining accessible for first-time learners.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that Griffiths serves as a solid introduction for undergraduate students, while others seek alternatives that may be more beneficial in the long run.
  • One participant proposes Peskin's "Concepts of Elementary Particles" as a potentially more modern and organized alternative, although they have not delved into technical details.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about the suitability of both Griffiths and Peskin, indicating a desire for a good introduction without being overwhelmed.
  • References to Thomson's work are mentioned as additional resources worth considering alongside Griffiths and Peskin.
  • One participant recommends a specific textbook link, suggesting it may be a useful resource.
  • Another participant mentions Wolfenstein and Silva's work, noting it may not be suitable for a full university course but still valuable.
  • A question is raised regarding the preference for theoretical versus experimental approaches, with a suggestion to focus on advanced topics after mastering introductory materials.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on a single alternative textbook to Griffiths, as multiple competing views and preferences for different resources are expressed throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants indicate varying levels of familiarity with the suggested textbooks and express differing opinions on what constitutes an appropriate level for introductory material. There is also a lack of clarity on how the suggested alternatives compare in terms of content and pedagogical approach.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for undergraduate students seeking recommendations for introductory particle physics textbooks, as well as educators looking for alternative resources to Griffiths.

Jamestein Newton
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Griffiths "introduction to elementary particles" serves a great introduction as a first course on particle physics for undergraduate students.
But what are the possible alternatives of this textbook? Like being more beneficial in the long run, more time-consuming, for aspired students. But it must be at the reasonable level! Since I have mentioned it's for first course on particle physics.

Explain with reasons.

On the first glance I found peskin "concepts of elementary particle" a more beneficial book with more modern approach. I don't look into the technical details. It also reviewed all the way about the past progress of particle physics in a more compact and organised way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jamestein Newton said:
Griffiths "introduction to elementary particles" serves a great introduction as a first course on particle physics for undergraduate students.
But what are the possible alternatives of this textbook?

Compared to Griffiths, for what level are you looking: lower level; same level; higher level?
 
George Jones said:
Compared to Griffiths, for what level are you looking: lower level; same level; higher level?
around the level of the first course on particle physics in undergraduate as I said.
Can be higher, but not too high

I am just looking for a good enough introduction and not sure whether those two are.
I will read those two at the same time but mainly Peskin
 
Jamestein Newton said:
around the level of the first course on particle physics in undergraduate as I said.
Can be higher, but not too high

I am just looking for a good enough introduction and not sure whether those two are.
I will read those two at the same time but mainly Peskin
Well Peskin has also included some references on the first course in particle physics. I believe in Peskin

like Thomson M., Griffiths. I'll also take a look on Thomson M. then now I would read three books at the same time. I think it's enough
 
Are you more into theory than experiment?

If you are into theory, I would suggest not spend too much time worrying about these introduction books, get Griffiths and then move on to learn about group theory, QFT, differential geometry and topology
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

High Energy Books on the Standard Model of elementary particle physics & beyond
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Applied A question about mathematics textbooks for physicists
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
8K
Quantum Comparing Griffiths and Zettili for QM: Help Needed!
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
9K
High Energy Recommended books in HEP, QFT, QM, GR
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Plasma Which order should I read these in?
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
What Technical Textbooks Should I Add to My Collection?
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
Better Textbook than Lamarsh for Nuclear Engineering
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Quantum Physics and math textbooks for self study
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Physics self teaching (curriculum and textbooks)
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
10K
Intro Physics Textbooks on Optics: Alternatives to Hetch-Zajac's "Optics"
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K