Whats the best way to show this?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rollcast
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the best way to represent the 1.16 root of x, with two options presented: \sqrt[1.16]{x} and x^{\frac{1}{1.16}}. Participants agree that both representations are mathematically equivalent, but option b) is favored for its clarity and ease of use in calculations and equations. The preference for b) stems from its general applicability in various mathematical contexts, making it more versatile. While option a) is appreciated for its uniqueness, it is less commonly used and can be more complex to incorporate into other mathematical expressions. Ultimately, option b) is recommended for its straightforwardness and practicality.
rollcast
Messages
403
Reaction score
0
I need to take the 1.16 root of x, do I show it as;

a) \sqrt[1.16]{x}

OR

b) x^{\frac{1}{1.16}}Thanks
AL
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
they're both exactly the same, but I would say b) is easier to work with and gets your point across more clearly.
 
I like (a), but that's only because I almost never see it, and I didn't know how to do it in latex until just now.
 
To use a calculator for a certain value of x, 1. leads to 2., so use 2. without worrying about root symbols.
 
yeah, I vote for b), too. More general and lends itself for easy inclusion into equations, polynomials, etc.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top