Can complex numbers, chaos theory, fractals, and power laws exist independently?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Justice Hunter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Connection
AI Thread Summary
Complex numbers, chaos theory, fractals, and power laws can exist independently of one another, as evidenced by examples demonstrating chaotic systems and fractals derived from real numbers without requiring complex numbers. The Mandelbrot set, while visually appealing in complex dimensions, is not essential for chaos or fractal formation, as shown by the iteration of the Logistic equation. Fractals can arise from non-complex systems, such as the Cantor set, which has a non-integer Hausdorff dimension. Power laws do not inherently possess chaotic characteristics, although they can be applied in various contexts. Overall, these mathematical concepts can develop separately, highlighting their unique properties and interrelations.
Justice Hunter
Messages
98
Reaction score
7
What is the connection between complex numbers, chaos theory, fractals, and power laws?

By connection i mean, does one require the other in order to exist?

For example, from my readings, complex numbers gave rise to the chaotic system, that proceeded to create the Mandelbrot set.

So the question is are each a requisite to the next? Or can any of these develop without the prior? Do these arise in our current understanding of modern physics?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
No, we can have chaotic systems and the Mandelbrot set without complex numbers. For example, "start with a number, x, between 0 and 1. At each step double x then drop the integer part and keep only the fraction part". For example, if we start with, say, x= 2/3, then 2x= 4/3 so, dropping the integer part, we have 1/3. Doubling again, 2/3 again and then it repeats. That gives sequence, 1/3, 2/3, 1/3, 2/3, ... with "period 2". And, in fact, we can get sequences of any period that way so this is a chaotic system in the real numbers..

The only reason complex numbers come into it is that we get "nicer" pictures if we work in two dimensions and the complex numbers are a two dimensional set.
 
  • Like
Likes just dani ok and Justice Hunter
There's nothing chaotic or complex about the power laws, except how some people apply them occasionally. :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes Justice Hunter
The iteration of the Logistic equation gives rise to Chaos , without need of Complex Numbers. A fractal, meaning a space with non-integer Hausdorff dimension (Edit: seems some describe it as a space whose Hausdorff dimension is larger than the topological dimension) can happen without use of Complexes too: the Cantor set has non-integer Hausdorff dimension log2/log3. I understand a chaotic system to be a Dynamical system whose attractor set (a version of a limiting space/set) is a fractal.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Justice Hunter
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top