What's the motivation of using silver atoms in the Stern-Gerlach experiment?

kof9595995
Messages
676
Reaction score
2
Historically the experiment was performed on silver atoms, but what's the reason of using silver?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Silver has a single valence electron, so with all the other electrons paired up I think with regard to its interaction with a magnetic field it will appear as a spin 1/2 particle. You might say that since Ag has an atomic number of 47, and thus at least one unpaired proton, it should look different than a spin 1/2 particle, but since the gyromagnetic ratio goes like 1/m, this is a small effect. Ultimately nothing is special about Ag, as wiki says the experiment was also performed with H later on.
 
Good question.

There's a lot of serendipity involved here, since it was a successful experiment demonstrating something completely different from what they intended. They didn't know about electron spin, their intent was to measure what they called the 'directional quantization' (richtungsquantisierung) of the electronic 'orbits' within the Bohr-Sommerfeld model, i.e. what we now call the magnetic quantum number.

I think they chose silver simply because it's relatively easy to produce a vapor of silver atoms. That was a lucky choice, since we now know silver is s1d10 and has no orbital magnetic moment, so they ended up seeing the electronic spin magnetic moment instead. Then they had luck again, since they first couldn't see the silver deposit on their plate, but happened to be smoking cheap cigars. The hydrogen sulfide from the cigar smoke reacted to form black silver sulfide and "developed" the spots.

So they made the wrong choice when it came to finding what they intended to look at, but the right choice in terms of finding out what the Stern-Gerlach experiment is now famous for having found out - electron spin.
 
alxm said:
but happened to be smoking cheap cigars

That gave me a belly laugh. I hadn't heard that story before.
 
OK,thank you guys.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top