What's the point of having a dress code stricter than business casual?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relevance of strict dress codes, particularly in academic and professional settings like conferences. Participants question the necessity of enforcing formal attire when societal norms have shifted towards more casual and expressive styles, including unconventional hair colors and makeup. While some argue that dress codes help maintain professionalism and protect the reputation of organizations, others feel they are often not enforced or relevant. The conversation highlights a tension between tradition and modernity in professional attire, suggesting that dress codes may serve more as guidelines than strict rules. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards the idea that dressing appropriately can still convey respect and professionalism in various environments.
random_soldier
Messages
80
Reaction score
10
Nowadays a lot of people like to fashion themselves in a way that is less traditional. You might see men wear make up or men and women coloring their hair some color that isn't naturally possible. Since society is so free, even among serious scholars (as I see in my department), what is the point of having a strict dress code?

I imagine one doesn't want someone showing up scantily clad or maybe there is a uniform requirement to represent a certain party or for a certain type of job but there doesn't seem to be much point for specifying such at social events in places such as conferences.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You probably need to define the environments you are asking about more carefully/narrowly.

We have a dress code at work that is there to give employees freedom when they are not interacting with customers, and to be sure that folks know what is expected when you do interact with customers.

I wore shorts and an athletic triathlon t-shirt to work today because I don't have any customer contacts today in my R&D engineering job, and because the outside temperature is in the 95 degree range. If I had customer meetings on my schedule today, I would have dressed business casual.
 
berkeman said:
You probably need to define the environments you are asking about more carefully/narrowly.

We have a dress code at work that is there to give employees freedom when they are not interacting with customers, and to be sure that folks know what is expected when you do interact with customers.

I wore shorts and an athletic triathlon t-shirt to work today because I don't have any customer contacts today in my R&D engineering job, and because the outside temperature is in the 95 degree range. If I had customer meetings on my schedule today, I would have dressed business casual.

I'm probably thinking about socializing between fellow scholars at conferences. Often they'll specify something such as business casual.
 
Really? Who specifies that? I haven't been to a conference in a couple of years, but I've never seen that in the terms and conditions of purchasing a pass to the conference and presentations.

Or do you mean that the university that you work for has a dress code when you attend a conference wearing a badge that has their university name on it?
 
berkeman said:
Really? Who specifies that? I haven't been to a conference in a couple of years, but I've never seen that in the terms and conditions of purchasing a pass to the conference and presentations.

Or do you mean that the university that you work for has a dress code when you attend a conference wearing a badge that has their university name on it?

The conference committee/organizers/etc. The last two I have been to (ANS and the IEEE ICOPS) had dress codes for those attending the conference. Going by your example, it would make sense for the workers to have some sort of uniform but the conference goers even if they are speakers, the logical reason hasn't come up in my head for them to do so.
 
Interesting! I hadn't seen that, but like I said it's been a couple years since I attended a technical conference. I wonder if others have see this...
 
I probably didn't phrase the initial question right. Would it give a better perspective if I said why don't people have to limit/wear specific make up or remove unnatural hair colors, etc., when a dress code is required? I didn't want to put it that way because it seemed insensitive.
 
Oh, that's different (I think). You mean they won't let you dress like a Kiss band member when attending a Particle Physics symposium? LOL...

1568335061573.png
 
  • Like
Likes QuantumQuest
Yeah totally! I'm just saying that it's strange that there are some I have seen having all sorts of face rings while wearing a suit. If things are like that, why bother with a code? At least, as you said, in a particle physics symposium.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #10
random_soldier said:
Since society is so free, even among serious scholars (as I see in my department), what is the point of having a strict dress code?
The answer hasn't changed from what it has always been (it's just been de-prioritized): dress to impress.
I imagine one doesn't want someone showing up scantily clad or maybe there is a uniform requirement to represent a certain party or for a certain type of job but there doesn't seem to be much point for specifying such at social events in places such as conferences.
That would depend on the conference, but the organizers of the conference are no different from the owners of a company: they have a reputation to protect/project that depends on the presentation and conduct of the attendees.
Would it give a better perspective if I said why don't people have to limit/wear specific make up or remove unnatural hair colors, etc., when a dress code is required?
That's harder to define and police and except in the case of extremely unnatural makeup/skin color is longer-established as mainstream.
 
  • Like
Likes QuantumQuest
  • #11
russ_watters said:
The answer hasn't changed from what it has always been (it's just been de-prioritized): dress to impress.

Well you have to consider that at one point wearing powdered wigs and men wearing high heels aligned with that goal. Don't know if it was dress code though. Wonder if this just more natural progression. Maybe at one point it will be impressive to come up with nice, unique color for your hair or something of that sort, even if biologically impossible.

russ_watters said:
That would depend on the conference, but the organizers of the conference are no different from the owners of a company: they have a reputation to protect/project that depends on the presentation and conduct of the attendees.

And that counts as what people usually see as impressive appearance?

russ_watters said:
That's harder to define and police and except in the case of extremely unnatural makeup/skin color is longer-established as mainstream.

Can I have examples of extreme cases that you are thinking of and what you think would and wouldn't be easy to police?
 
  • #12
random_soldier said:
Well you have to consider that at one point wearing powdered wigs and men wearing high heels aligned with that goal. Don't know if it was dress code though. Wonder if this just more natural progression. Maybe at one point it will be impressive to come up with nice, unique color for your hair or something of that sort, even if biologically impossible.
Maybe, but I think you will find looking back at historical photos and paintings that the whims of fashion when it comes to semi-formal and formal dress have not been very significant. If you bumped into this guy at the theater tomorrow, would you even notice anything odd about him?:

abe-lincoln.jpg


And that counts as what people usually see as impressive appearance?
Certainly. The more formally people are dressed, the more serious and professional the perception of the conference. Note: I'm in industry, not academia, and this is probably considered more important in industry because there's more sales and job searching going on.
Can I have examples of extreme cases that you are thinking of and what you think would and wouldn't be easy to police?
I'm talking about your examples. It wouldn't be easy to police because it isn't easy to define where, for example, to draw the line on a rule about "unnatural hair color" or makeup. Typically in my experience, they just say "business casual" and then don't actually police it; You'd have to be way outside the norm for someone to say something. I suspect if you showed up in a nice 3-piece suit and bright green hair, no one would complain unless you started mumbling excitedly about Batman.
 
  • #13
russ_watters said:
Maybe, but I think you will find looking back at historical photos and paintings that the whims of fashion when it comes to semi-formal and formal dress have not been very significant. If you bumped into this guy at the theater tomorrow, would you even notice anything odd about him?:

View attachment 249559

I'm not sure I understand. Given what movie theaters are now of course I would think it is rather strange a fellow would come dressed so formally.

russ_watters said:
I'm talking about your examples. It wouldn't be easy to police because it isn't easy to define where, for example, to draw the line on a rule about "unnatural hair color" or makeup. Typically in my experience, they just say "business casual" and then don't actually police it; You'd have to be way outside the norm for someone to say something. I suspect if you showed up in a nice 3-piece suit and bright green hair, no one would complain unless you started mumbling excitedly about Batman.

That's true. I could've sworn that at ICOPS one of the goers was dressed like a biker or trucker. Saw him wear the same day in day out and nobody batted an eye. Did seem rather lonely though. Could be because of his dress.
 
  • #14
random_soldier said:
I'm just saying that it's strange that there are some I have seen having all sorts of face rings while wearing a suit. If things are like that, why bother with a code? At least, as you said, in a particle physics symposium.
It is kind of a traditional competition to stretch the code while still keeping it: but with having no code, no fun.
Originally it was more like a privilege for women, but men was never really exempted.

Ps.: my humble opinion about face rings and such is, that such attempts are lacking elegance: more like proof of laziness than a winning move. On the other hand an unusual but well picked hair color... :peacesign:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Klystron, random_soldier and russ_watters
  • #15
random_soldier said:
Since society is so free, even among serious scholars (as I see in my department), what is the point of having a strict dress code?
The point is to conform to social and cultural standards, and to avoid stimulating disorderly behavior.
 
  • #16
berkeman said:
Oh, that's different (I think). You mean they won't let you dress like a Kiss band member when attending a Particle Physics symposium? LOL...

View attachment 249556
That's an interesting dress-form example. Those guys are shown in their "performance attire", or costume.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #17
random_soldier said:
I'm not sure I understand. Given what movie theaters are now of course I would think it is rather strange a fellow would come dressed so formally.
About the portrait of Abe Lincoln, you might not expect that at a movie theatre but more likely at some classical music performance at a theatre or maybe some play done at a theatre.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #18
random_soldier said:
I'm not sure I understand. Given what movie theaters are now of course I would think it is rather strange a fellow would come dressed so formally.
"The theater" is a reference to a live show, a la Broadway.
 
  • #19
symbolipoint said:
more likely at ...some play done at a theatre.

Maybe not. I heard he had a bad experience at a play at a theatre once.
 
  • Haha
Likes Klystron
  • #20
I've been to many, many conferences and I have never seen a dress code enforced. It is most likely there so if someone is wearing a T-shirt with some message that the organizers would have trouble with: a political statement, a Confederate flag, something risque, etc. they can object on the grounds that it's a T-shirt without getting into the content.

My rule of thumb is to dress in the top half but not the top 10% of the attendees in terms of formality. When speaking, I will shift that upward, and when speaking in a plenary session at a major conference, upward still further. You want to look professional but not to stand out.
 
  • Like
Likes QuantumQuest, Klystron, random_soldier and 1 other person
  • #21
Vanadium 50 said:
Maybe not. I heard he had a bad experience at a play at a theatre once.
Well, but it was only that one time...
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
  • #22
Vanadium 50 said:
Maybe not. I heard he had a bad experience at a play at a theatre once.
berkeman said:
Well, but it was only that one time...
"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes QuantumQuest, nuuskur, Klystron and 1 other person
  • #23
Vanadium 50 said:
Maybe not. I heard he had a bad experience at a play at a theatre once.
Yes, but not because he wasn't appropriately dressed.
 
  • #24
Vanadium 50 said:
I've been to many, many conferences and I have never seen a dress code enforced. It is most likely there so if someone is wearing a T-shirt with some message that the organizers would have trouble with: a political statement, a Confederate flag, something risque, etc. they can object on the grounds that it's a T-shirt without getting into the content.

My rule of thumb is to dress in the top half but not the top 10% of the attendees in terms of formality. When speaking, I will shift that upward, and when speaking in a plenary session at a major conference, upward still further. You want to look professional but not to stand out.
This has been my experience/practice as well (industry events). Incidentally, I use similar criteria for speeding.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes random_soldier, Vanadium 50 and berkeman
  • #25
I did not carefully read the full original question and topic title when I made my post #15. Why "business casual" may be insufficient in dressing level, not really about keeping social or crowd order, but maybe better uniformity for visual labeling of some kind. I must let other members give possibly better responses.
 
  • #26
When I was managing groups of young engineers at a startup, I was mainly concerned that they wear proper safety equipment. Most of the young techs wore hemmed 'cargo' shorts and a polo or short sleeved shirt given 100+F temperatures outdoors. A delegation came to me with a dress code request. A recent hire, a mathematician from Romania, tried to blend in with his American colleagues and deal with the desert climate by wearing snug short shorts and tight cycling shirts in bright pastel colors.

The lead from the data center delegation wore neat denim shorts below the knee and a loose size XXl dress shirt, the latter indicating his wife's preference for shopping at Kohls and Macy's. The lead programmer, an USAF veteran, wore olive drab cargo shorts hemmed at the knee and a black T-shirt from the previous year's SANS conference. Normally, I would not notice these details except for their odd request

Both groups were upset by the short length of the new member's shorts. They advised me that only females wore shorts that revealed the upper leg (in our culture). While they did not care if he was gay (he was hetero with two children), he should adhere to the unwritten dress code and wear shorts with a minimum 9" inseam. Beneath the knee preferred for serious work.

I dismissed the delegation and spoke to the new worker at our scheduled review meeting. I gently suggested he notice how his co-workers dressed and consider longer garments. The baffled mathematician could not understood why people would not dress as minimally as possible in the heat and that his small family saved money by sharing clothes. Logical. (He also offered to teach cycling to his overweight coworkers to replace the ubiquitous pickup trucks, but that is another story.)

The next week he came to work wearing long sleeved black dress shirts and slacks with black safety shoes exactly like his manager, mitigated by driving his family's bright pink tiny Eco car.
 
  • Haha
Likes random_soldier and berkeman
  • #27
Twenty-five years ago, when I started teaching physics at university as a sessional instructor, I could (within reason) wear whatever I wanted when teaching. On occasion, I wore shorts and a t-shirt. At the same time and university, my friend, who was an engineering sessional instructor, had to abide by the engineering lecturer dress code, which was dress pants, dress shirt, tie. At that time and university, there was a difference for physics and and engineering lecturers.
 
  • #28
random_soldier said:
Well you have to consider that at one point wearing powdered wigs and men wearing high heels aligned with that goal.
russ_watters said:
. . .dress to impress.
And, I must add, this should be done, in a very dedicated and thoughtful manner. 🙄

Unless, of course. . . your own sweat smells the best. . . . :DD.
 
Last edited:
  • #29
Klystron said:
Logical. (He also offered to teach cycling to his overweight coworkers to replace the ubiquitous pickup trucks, but that is another story.)
Love it! :smile:
 
  • #30
Klystron said:
When I was managing groups of young engineers at a startup, I was mainly concerned that they wear proper safety equipment. Most of the young techs wore hemmed 'cargo' shorts and a polo or short sleeved shirt given 100+F temperatures outdoors. A delegation came to me with a dress code request. A recent hire, a mathematician from Romania, tried to blend in with his American colleagues and deal with the desert climate by wearing snug short shorts and tight cycling shirts in bright pastel colors.

The lead from the data center delegation wore neat denim shorts below the knee and a loose size XXl dress shirt, the latter indicating his wife's preference for shopping at Kohls and Macy's. The lead programmer, an USAF veteran, wore olive drab cargo shorts hemmed at the knee and a black T-shirt from the previous year's SANS conference. Normally, I would not notice these details except for their odd request

Both groups were upset by the short length of the new member's shorts. They advised me that only females wore shorts that revealed the upper leg (in our culture). While they did not care if he was gay (he was hetero with two children), he should adhere to the unwritten dress code and wear shorts with a minimum 9" inseam. Beneath the knee preferred for serious work.

I dismissed the delegation and spoke to the new worker at our scheduled review meeting. I gently suggested he notice how his co-workers dressed and consider longer garments. The baffled mathematician could not understood why people would not dress as minimally as possible in the heat and that his small family saved money by sharing clothes. Logical. (He also offered to teach cycling to his overweight coworkers to replace the ubiquitous pickup trucks, but that is another story.)

The next week he came to work wearing long sleeved black dress shirts and slacks with black safety shoes exactly like his manager, mitigated by driving his family's bright pink tiny Eco car.

Rather inconsiderate that a foreigner would be expected to take note of such a detail, isn't it?
 
  • #31
random_soldier said:
Rather inconsiderate that a foreigner would be expected to take note of such a detail, isn't it?
True. I Had recently moved from a neighboring state (2000) and had never heard this 'code' .

One of the reasons some schools, jobs and professions stress wearing a uniform. Espirt de corp is a by product of uniform clothing and dress codes. The primary reason is for people from disparate backgrounds to accept strangers into the group.
 
  • #32
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes berkeman, random_soldier, QuantumQuest and 3 others
  • #34
random_soldier said:
Rather inconsiderate that a foreigner would be expected to take note of such a detail, isn't it?
I'm having trouble parsing this, but maybe you misunderstood what you were reading; by not being too specific, the manager was speaking with tact.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron
  • #35
russ_watters said:
Am from Philadelphia and have clients on the West Coast; can confirm.
From the SF Bay Area. Notice the West Coaster's shoes. The palm tree silhouettes and running shoes scream Southern California. Northern California dudes wear sandals and 'boat shoes'; hiking boots in cold weather or when breaking in a new pair from REI. :cool:

On business or government trips to the East Coast I pack a good suit, dress shirts and (gulp) ties. I never understood the latter; cuts off blood supply to brain. Plus dress sandals.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes random_soldier and russ_watters
  • #36
I agree about the tie, as well as seeing other problems with such a garment. On the other side, a tie may have its uses but not really important as a piece of clothing to wear.
 
  • Haha
Likes berkeman
  • #37
symbolipoint said:
On the other side, a tie may have its uses
As a tourniquet, perhaps?
Or for those annoying sucking chest wounds, you can just wad it up and stuff it in there.
 
  • #38
symbolipoint said:
I agree about the tie, as well as seeing other problems with such a garment. On the other side, a tie may have its uses but not really important as a piece of clothing to wear.
Mark44 said:
As a tourniquet, perhaps?
Or for those annoying sucking chest wounds, you can just wad it up and stuff it in there.
I have read that neckties originated as fashion wear during feasts, used to wipe wine, juices and gravy from mouth and fingers. That explains long fat ties but not other styles.

Author John Le Carre's perennial character George Smiley puts his wide fat silk neckties to good use polishing his eyeglasses. I OTOH find neckties smear my lenses. Perhaps lens polishing requires a finer grade of silk or lenses made from glass instead of acrylic.
 
  • #39
Some brief internet searching I did a few years ago exposed that ties originated as a way to let a group self-identify, something like but not identical to wearing a uniform - group identity. Romans may have done this.
 
  • #40
russ_watters said:
I'm having trouble parsing this, but maybe you misunderstood what you were reading; by not being too specific, the manager was speaking with tact.

I was referring to the ones who made the request to the manager. From that post, they were said to be upset so it sounded like they were in a huff which seemed unfair especially considering from the sounds of the story and Klystron, seemed fairly arbitrary. That is what I was referring to.
 
  • #41
random_soldier said:
I was referring to the ones who made the request to the manager. From that post, they were said to be upset so it sounded like they were in a huff which seemed unfair especially considering from the sounds of the story and Klystron, seemed fairly arbitrary.
Oh...ok, well I thought we at least agreed that fashion and dress codes/standards/conventions are pretty much always arbitrary except in the case of safety. So I'm still not really clear on what would be inconsiderate about making someone aware of even an unwritten convention. Heck, from their point of view they likely considered the new worker to be inconsiderate with his fashion choices, for not noticing and conforming to the convention.

FYI, I was in the military, where it is taught as a virtue to correct things/people you see that aren't right and to accept constructive criticism yourself. Dress codes are a minor example of that, but if we can't accept correction over something minor, then how can we be expected to accept correction when the stakes are higher?
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron and berkeman
  • #42
My point is that, from what I can gather from the story, a gesture of good faith seemed to backfire a bit too drastically and it didn't sound like everybody was content to just notify the manager and go about their business, which I found a bit disappointing.
 
  • #43
Klystron said:
From the SF Bay Area. Notice the West Coaster's shoes. The palm tree silhouettes and running shoes scream Southern California. Northern California dudes wear sandals
Speak for yourself please. I wear my worn out ASICS Gel running shoes for my daily shoes. Cycle them through every 6 months (Quiz Question -- Why every 6 months?) :smile:
 
  • Wow
Likes Klystron
  • #44
They are that low quality. No offense but my experience with non "top" tier brands (reebok, nike, etc.) has been poor.
 
  • #45
Interesting. I've been running on ASICS Gels for probably the last `15 years. What brand and model do you recommend that I try? I'd be open to trying a new shoe for my runs...
 
  • #46
Oh sorry. You were quizzing so I took a stab. I don't think I could actually give the best advice.
 
  • #47
random_soldier said:
My point is that, from what I can gather from the story, a gesture of good faith seemed to backfire a bit too drastically and it didn't sound like everybody was content to just notify the manager and go about their business, which I found a bit disappointing.
Yeah, I guess I'm not following at all - I don't understand how either of those points apply.

Let me switch it up a bit. European countries also tend to have...different...standards of hygiene from the USA, and this is also a social convention that isn't necessarily clearly spelled-out in employee handbooks. Is it inconsiderate to point that out to a new employee from Europe - or to their boss - or inconsiderate of the employee from Europe to not notice and adjust to the culture of the new job?

IMO, employees have a responsibility to follow the company culture, managers have a responsibility to educate new employees about that culture and fellow employees have a right to complain to management when it isn't being followed. In fact, for the other employees, they are legally obligated to take their complaints to management instead of directly to their fellow employees (if that's what your point was).
 
  • #48
russ_watters said:
Yeah, I guess I'm not following at all - I don't understand how either of those points apply.

What points? I thought I only made one.

russ_watters said:
Let me switch it up a bit. European countries also tend to have...different...standards of hygiene from the USA, and this is also a social convention that isn't necessarily clearly spelled-out in employee handbooks. Is it inconsiderate to point that out to a new employee from Europe or inconsiderate of the employee from Europe to not notice and adjust to the culture of the new job?

I don't see the comparison. If there is a bidet, I use that. If there is toilet paper, I use that.

russ_watters said:
IMO, employees have a responsibility to follow the company culture, managers have a responsibility to educate new employees about that culture and fellow employees have a right to complain to management when it isn't being followed. In fact, for the other employees, they are legally obligated to take their complaints to management instead of directly to their fellow employees (if that's what your point was).

All this can be avoided if an organization just explicitly states a dress code somewhere where nobody will miss it like said employee handbook.
 
  • #49
random_soldier said:
What points? I thought I only made one.
These two:
1. "A gesture of good faith seemed to backfire..."
2. "...it didn't sound like everybody was content to just notify the manager and go about their business."

I don't know what "gesture of good faith" you are referring to and I don't know what you think "everybody" wanted to do beyond "...just notifying the manager and go about their business." Honestly, I can't connect either of those points to the scenario I read.

I don't see the comparison. If there is a bidet, I use that. If there is toilet paper, I use that.
Great! How about a shower and deodorant? What if you are use them weekly whereas everyone you work with uses them daily? Should you adjust and is it inconsiderate if you don't or if anyone points it out?
All this can be avoided if an organization just explicitly states a dress code somewhere where nobody will miss it like said employee handbook.
That's really difficult to specify and/or police. Even if a company specified a shower and deodorant application frequency, how would they prove whether someone was following those rules?
 
  • #50
russ_watters said:
These two:
1. "A gesture of good faith seemed to backfire..."
2. "...it didn't sound like everybody was content to just notify the manager and go about their business."

I don't know what "gesture of good faith" you are referring to and I don't know what you think "everybody" wanted to do beyond "...just notifying the manager and go about their business." Honestly, I can't connect either of those points to the scenario I read.

1. The story mentions, that the person was trying to "fit in" through his choice of clothing. Gesture of good faith because he actively thought about his clothing choice to make his peers comfortable with him.
2. Poster used the word "upset" to describe those informing management of the new additions clothing. Pretty strong word, IMO to describe ones disposition.

russ_watters said:
Great! How about a shower and deodorant? What if you are use them weekly whereas everyone you work with uses them daily? Should you adjust and is it inconsiderate if you don't or if anyone points it out?

Can you tell when somebody has or hasn't? Unless they clearly haven't done so in a while, in which case I think the smell would get to them to. Otherwise, nobody is the wiser and everyone just goes about their business.

russ_watters said:
That's really difficult to specify and/or police. Even if a company specified a shower and deodorant application frequency, how would they prove whether someone was following those rules?

How does anyone else specify/police/prove it better?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top