What's this steel bearing plate going to do under this steel I beam?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the structural implications of a steel bearing plate designed to support a steel I-beam in a residential construction project. Participants explore the purpose of the spreader plate, its connection to the I-beam, and the load distribution over the underlying masonry. The conversation includes technical considerations related to structural integrity and compliance with building codes.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the spreader plate's role is to distribute the load from the I-beam over the masonry to prevent excessive compressive forces.
  • Others propose that the spreader plate may serve to resist tension in the bricks beneath the I-beam, rather than distributing the load.
  • One participant mentions that the design does not include bolting or welding, which raises questions about how effective the spreader plate will be in load distribution.
  • Another participant provides calculations indicating that the proposed bearing plate may not meet code requirements for bearing capacity, suggesting that the stresses could exceed acceptable limits.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for the spreader plate to rotate under load if it is not connected to the I-beam, which could affect load distribution.
  • Some participants argue that the primary function of the plate may be to provide a flat surface for the beam, ensuring proper alignment and load distribution through the mortar bed.
  • There is a discussion about the adequacy of the plate size and the underlying masonry to handle the expected loads, with references to building regulations and structural calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the purpose and effectiveness of the spreader plate, with no consensus reached regarding its design or adequacy for the intended load-bearing function. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives on the structural implications.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the absence of specific details about the beam sizes and the exact load conditions. There are also unresolved questions regarding the assumptions made in the calculations and the definitions of terms used in the design.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals involved in structural engineering, construction, or home renovation, particularly those seeking insights into load distribution and structural design considerations.

  • #31
See note 11

http://www.lbhf.gov.uk/Directory/En...ions/19870_Structural_Alteration_Guidance.asp

There are two routes to satisfying the building regs.

The deemed to satisfy route as above where the code provides a figure that should be safe in all cases because of generous margins of safety.

The full calculations route where more accurate calculations or even tests are performed to achieve a more economical solution by reducing the margins of safety to known but acceptable limits.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1040535/Beam%20Bearing%20Plate%20McCormac-AISC.pdf

Text is from McCormac's Structural Steel Design, 4th ed. The example is from AISC Design Examples v 14.0. It is specific to the US, so it may or may not be useful...
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
16K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
33
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K