When Do Similar Linear Operators Share Ordered Bases?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the conditions under which two linear operators, S and T, on a finite-dimensional vector space V can share ordered bases a and b such that their matrix representations [S]a and [T]b are equal. It is established that such bases exist if and only if there is an invertible linear operator U on V satisfying T = USU^{-1}. The proof involves defining U based on the mapping of basis elements and demonstrating the relationship between the operators through matrix representations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear operators and their properties
  • Familiarity with finite-dimensional vector spaces
  • Knowledge of matrix representations of linear transformations
  • Concept of invertible linear operators
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of invertible linear operators in vector spaces
  • Learn about the relationship between linear transformations and their matrix representations
  • Explore the concept of basis transformations in linear algebra
  • Investigate the implications of similarity of linear operators
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, as well as educators looking to deepen their understanding of linear operator theory and matrix representations.

guroten
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let V be a finite-dimensional vector space over the field F and let S and T
be linear operators on V. We ask: When do there exist ordered bases a and b
for V such that a = [T]b? Prove that such bases exist if and only if there is
an invertible linear operator U on V such that T = USU-1. (Outline of proof:
If a = [T]b, let U be the operator which carries a onto b and show that
S = UTU-1. Conversely, if T = USU-1 for some invertible U, let a be any
ordered basis for V and let b be its image under U. Then show that a = [T]b.
where [T]b means T with relative to b

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure where to start. Is there a particular theorem to use here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[Note: I think the [itex]U[/itex] and [itex]U^{-1}[/itex] should be reversed in the problem statement.]

I don't think you need any particular theorem. The proof outline looks good. So let's suppose that there do exist two bases, [itex]a[/itex] and [itex]b[/itex], such that [itex]<s>a = [T]b</s>[/itex].

Let's give the basis elements some names:

[tex]a = \{a_1,\ldots,a_n\}[/tex]
[tex]b = \{b_1,\ldots,b_n\}[/tex]

As the outline suggests, let us define a new operator U as follows:

[tex]U(a_j) = b_j, \textrm{ for }j=1,\ldots,n[/tex]

Since we have specified [itex]U[/itex] on a basis for [itex]V[/itex], that uniquely defines [itex]U[/itex] on all of [itex]V[/itex]. By the way, note that [itex]U[/itex] is invertible.

Now consider the operator [itex]U^{-1}TU[/itex]. In particular, can you find a useful way to express this operator in terms of the basis [itex]a[/itex]?

Hint: you want to express [itex][U^{-1}TU]_a[/itex] as the product of three matrices, where the middle one is [itex][T]_b[/itex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K