• Rib5
I meant checking answers.In summary, the conversation discusses the use of Maxima to solve an engineering problem and the discovery of two answers instead of one. The question arises of when to check answers and the importance of always checking work in the engineering field to avoid costly mistakes.
Rib5
I was working on an engineering problem where I had to find the value of a component. I used Maxima (a computer algebra system) to get my answer, except that I got two answers instead of one. Only one of the answers satisfied my initial conditions.

So my question is "when do you need to check your answers"? I seem to recall some stuff about symmetrical functions or always positive or something else. Can anyone help me out or point me to some reading?

If anyone wants to know the exact equations I was using, they are here.

L1*L2 - M^2
------------------- = Leq
L1+L2 - 2*M

where L1 = L2 = 0.2
and Leq = 0.14

---->Solve for M

The answer I got was M = 0.2 and M = 0.08

If you plug in M = 0.2 you get 0.

Can anyone explain where this false answer came from?

Rib5 said:
If you plug in M = 0.2 you get 0.

$$L_1+L_2-2M=0$$ so the whole thing is undefined, not 0.

Last edited:
qntty said:
$L_1+L_2-2M=0$ so the whole thing is undefined, not 0.

Ooops, that is true. But it still doesn't answer the main question. One of the answers is still invalid.

If the equation is to make any sense, we must assume that $$L_1+L_2\not=2M$$

qntty said:
If the equation is to make any sense, we must assume that $$L_1+L_2\not=2M$$

I know. That assumption is what made me know that one of the answers was bogus. But the question I am asking is how do you know when to expect bogus answers so you know to test them instead of just assuming they are correct?

If there are radicals involved in the equation to be solved, then there is always a chance that one of the answers doesn't work, and this must always be checked because it's hard to catch. When there are fractions, division by zero could occur, but you don't need to check it in most cases as long as you take not of the bogus values before you solve the problem. If you are about to divide by a variable which isn't necessarily zero, then a solution is often times lost. When you're working with functions and their inverses (such as trig functions), be aware of the domain and range of the function and check you're answer, unless the function is bijective.

qntty said:
If there are radicals involved in the equation to be solved, then there is always a chance that one of the answers doesn't work, and this must always be checked because it's hard to catch. When there are fractions, division by zero could occur, but you don't need to check it in most cases as long as you take not of the bogus values before you solve the problem. If you are about to divide by a variable which isn't necessarily zero, then a solution is often times lost. When you're working with functions and their inverses (such as trig functions), be aware of the domain and range of the function and check you're answer, unless the function is bijective.

Rib5 said:
So my question is "when do you need to check your answers"?
Nobody has answered this simple question yet. The answer is equally simple: Always.

Engineers and scientists working in the real world often make decisions that, if wrong, can cost their employers an immense amount of money. Graduates fresh out of college can cost their employer tens of thousands of dollars with a simple screwup. Nobody trusts freshouts, at least not initially. Once you have gained your employer's trust, your mistakes might cost them hundreds of thousands, then millions, and later on in your career, even more. Employers trust these people even less. Complex projects often have a special team, the verification and validation team, whose sole job is to detect mistakes. Extremely complex projects have yet another team, the independent verification and validation team, whose sole job is to detect mistakes that have slipped through all the checks and balances.

Just because multiple layers of people exist whose jobs are to detect errors made by the design and development teams does not give the designers and developers free reign to make mistakes. Those verification and validation jobs exist in small quantities because the original designers are expected to have done their due diligence in checking their own work. Sloppy work done by the design and development team inevitably leads to incomplete work done by the verification and validation teams and a garbage product going out the door.

Moral of the story: Get in the habit of always checking your work.

D H said:
Nobody has answered this simple question yet. The answer is equally simple: Always.

Engineers and scientists working in the real world often make decisions that, if wrong, can cost their employers an immense amount of money. Graduates fresh out of college can cost their employer tens of thousands of dollars with a simple screwup. Nobody trusts freshouts, at least not initially. Once you have gained your employer's trust, your mistakes might cost them hundreds of thousands, then millions, and later on in your career, even more. Employers trust these people even less. Complex projects often have a special team, the verification and validation team, whose sole job is to detect mistakes. Extremely complex projects have yet another team, the independent verification and validation team, whose sole job is to detect mistakes that have slipped through all the checks and balances.

Just because multiple layers of people exist whose jobs are to detect errors made by the design and development teams does not give the designers and developers free reign to make mistakes. Those verification and validation jobs exist in small quantities because the original designers are expected to have done their due diligence in checking their own work. Sloppy work done by the design and development team inevitably leads to incomplete work done by the verification and validation teams and a garbage product going out the door.

Moral of the story: Get in the habit of always checking your work.

Thanks for that real world info. I think I should have been more specific about my question though. I didn't mean checking work for errors in the solutions, but knowing when bogus answers are possible. I guess getting more than one answer usually means you should check to make sure they both work, especially when only one answer should physically make sense.

As far as checking for the correct answer, I think I am covered because I spend almost as much time checking my answers on my homework as actually solve them. I usually run a simulation in spice (electrical engineering simulation tool) to make sure it checks out.

It's a matter of learning which mathematical operations can introduce extraneous solutions.

If the derivation involves:

• squaring both sides of the equation (as is often done to eliminate radicals)
• raising both sides of the equation to any even power
• taking the sine, cosine, or any periodic function of the equation
• employing any function whose inverse operation is not itself a function (such as squaring, sine, cosh, etc.)

... then you need to check for false answers.

Last edited:
Redbelly98 said:
It's a matter of learning which mathematical operations can introduce extraneous solutions.

If the derivation involves:

• squaring both sides of the equation (as is often done to eliminate radicals)
• raising both sides of the equation to any even power
• taking the sine, cosine, or any periodic function of the equation
• employing any function whose inverse operation is not itself a function (such as squaring, sine, cosh, etc.)

... then you need to check for false answers.

also, multiplying both sides of an equation by an expression containing a variable.

## 1. When is it necessary to check your answers in science?

It is always necessary to check your answers in science to ensure that your data and conclusions are accurate and reliable.

## 3. What are the consequences of not checking your answers in science?

If you do not check your answers in science, you may end up with incorrect or misleading data, which can lead to inaccurate conclusions and potentially harm your credibility as a scientist.

## 5. Can you skip checking your answers in science if you are confident in your work?

No, it is still important to check your answers even if you are confident in your work. There may be errors or discrepancies that you did not notice, and checking your answers can help to catch and correct these mistakes.

• Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
750
• Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
• Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
• Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
• Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
778
• Electrical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
1K
• Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
108
Views
32K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
861
• Mechanics
Replies
2
Views
590