When does this get really difficult?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MikeBeer
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, a second-year astronomy/physics double major seeks clarity on when courses become significantly more challenging. Insights suggest that the transition to more complex material typically occurs between the second and third year, moving beyond high school concepts. The conversation notes that while junior and senior year GPAs tend to be higher, this may be attributed to attrition, as students who struggle early on often switch majors, thus skewing the grade averages. Additionally, it is emphasized that graduate students, having completed several more years of study, naturally possess a deeper understanding of physics and astronomy, especially as they prepare for comprehensive exams that require integration of knowledge across various fields.
MikeBeer
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I'm starting my second year as an astronomy/physics double major. Up to this point, I've only had basic foundation courses, most of which I've come across in high school. I know this question is highly subjective, but when do the courses start to become really difficult? I've heard from TAs that the first two years are mostly foundational material and it starts getting "serious" around the junior year, is this true? However, the gpas of the courses in the junior/senior year are higher than the first two years; why is this the case? For example, I work with a first-year graduate student and, although I understand that he has had 3-4 more years of schooling than me, he seems to know a great deal about even the more specific aspects of astronomy. Any insight is much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's consistent with my experience. Somewhere between second and third year is when you start to get into the stuff that isn't so much just an extension of high school concepts. A lot depends I think on the order you take the courses in. And for some people, it doesn't get hard until graduate school.

The only explanation I might have for higher GPAs would be attrition. The students who struggle too much in the first couple years tend to switch majors, removing the lower marks from the grade pool.

Also, why wouldn't a grad student with 3-4 more years of schooling know more about physics than a student going into the second year of undergrad? You cover a LOT of material over the duration of a physics degree (or at least you should). And if the graduate student is preparing for a comprehensive or candidacy exam, it is likely that he or she is spending a lot of time relating the material in different fields to each other.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top