When Is a Quantum Field Theory Exactly Solved?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lester
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qft
Lester
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
A question I would like to get an answer is when is a QFT exactly solved? E.g. if I know the solution of the equation for the two-point function I have got all about the theory? This equation is classical in nature being the two-point function defined in the sense of distributions. I have read the original paper of Schwinger about QED2 and he does exactly this.

Jon
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lester said:
A question I would like to get an answer is when is a QFT exactly solved?
One meaning of "solved" is that we have a complete set of eigenstates of the full
(interacting) Hamiltonian. I.e., one has "diagonalized" the interacting Hamiltonian.
With such a complete set, the properties of any scattering scenario or bound state can
be expressed analytically in closed form (exactly).

E.g. if I know the solution of the equation for the two-point function I have got
all about the theory?
That's not enough. But did you mean 2-point or 4-point? (Don't you need 4-point to
describe 2-particle scattering?)

This equation is classical in nature being the two-point function defined in the
sense of distributions. I have read the original paper of Schwinger about QED2 and
he does exactly this.
Could you give a more precise reference, pls?
 
I think that in QED there are only a few exact results, e.g. the exact expression for the pair creation probability per unit volume and time in a constant electric field. You can write this as a functional determinant and exactly evaluate it.
 
Count Iblis said:
I think that in QED there are only a few exact results, e.g. the exact expression for the pair creation probability per unit volume and time in a constant electric field. You can write this as a functional determinant and exactly evaluate it.

Nothing is known exactly in QED. The functional determinant only sums one-loop graphs (an electron-positron loop in the external field, but with no virtual photons exchanged).

There are a number of exact results in two spacetime dimensions, however.
 
About reference I mean the Schwinger's paper about QED in 1+1 dimensions (Phys. Rev. 128, 2425 (1962)) but I think that any reliable textbook should give the same information.

For a QFT generally a two-point function is enough to compute scattering amplitudes by LSZ formalism. This formalism is exact and should give also information about states and asymptotic states.

Jon
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top