When standard deviation is undefined?

socrates_1
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hi, I just solved a probability density function problem and the standard deviation is undefined.Does anyone know why it happens?It would help to develop my understanding.Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since you provided no details about the problem or the distribution you derived, it's hard for anyone to comment. Do you mean that the integral diverges when you try to calculate the variance? That's not unusual; there are a number of distributions lacking finite variance (see: Cauchy distribution).
 
Number Nine said:
Since you provided no details about the problem or the distribution you derived, it's hard for anyone to comment. Do you mean that the integral diverges when you try to calculate the variance? That's not unusual; there are a number of distributions lacking finite variance (see: Cauchy distribution).

Thank you very much for your response.The probability density function is given by :
f(x)= 24/x^3

When I try to calculate ∫ (x^2) f(x) - (m^2) is undefined.Why this is so?
 
socrates_1 said:
Thank you very much for your response.The probability density function is given by :
f(x)= 24/x^3

That's not a valid density function. Are there any restrictions on x that you are forgetting to tell us?
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top