When to use equal to or equivalent to?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Darth Frodo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalent
Darth Frodo
Messages
211
Reaction score
1
When is it appropriate to use \equiv as opposed to =?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
well, here are a couple of examples, although I don't know that it would ever be wrong to use = when you mean equivalent.

y = ax + b [this is an "assignment" which is typical for "="]

a + b == b + a [this is not an assignment but a statement of equivalence]
 
Darth Frodo said:
When is it appropriate to use \equiv as opposed to =?
Use ##\equiv## for equations that are identically true, such as (x + 1)2 ##\equiv## x2 + 2x + 1 and sin2(x) + cos2(x) ##\equiv## 1. Each of these equations is true for any real x.

Use = for equations that are conditionally true, such as 2x + 1 = 5. This equation is true only for x = 2; i.e., only under certain conditions.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Oh ok. Thanks Mark & phinds! That really cleared it up!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top