When would a wooden barrel implode? (sinking under water)

  • Thread starter Thread starter James3355
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Water
AI Thread Summary
A sealed wooden barrel filled with air will implode at shallower depths compared to a water-filled barrel due to the compressibility of air versus water. The water-filled barrel is less likely to fracture because water's incompressibility maintains internal pressure, allowing it to withstand greater depths. The discussion also highlights that the wood type, stave thickness, and dimensions significantly influence the barrel's structural integrity under pressure. It is suggested that the ends of the barrel would likely implode before the walls due to their design, which allows for some arch-like support. Overall, the water-filled barrel is expected to endure deeper pressures than the air-filled one.
James3355
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
Two scenarios for you...
A) A wooden barrel, say 50 litres, is sealed with just air inside.
B) A wooden barrel, also 50 litres, is sealed but is completely full with water.

If you weighted both of them and sunk them in the ocean, at what depth would they implode from the pressure at depth? Is the water-filled barrel going to survive longer because it is less compressible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
James3355 said:
water-filled barrel going to survive longer because it is less compressible?
Yes. Next --- what wood? What stave thickness and radius? What length to diameter?
 
Water is very hard to compress. As you take the water-filled barrel deeper and deeper, the sides will 'give' a bit but the internal pressure will always be high enough (until you are sooo deep that water ceases to behave like water on Earth (I suspect)) but the sides would not actually fracture. (The displacement would be so small)
Otoh, if the barrel were filled with air, the water pressure on the weakest sections of the barrel would soon push it in because the internal pressure would follow that of the gas laws and, basically, hardly change at all by the time the barrel was crushed. At what depth? No idea but I suspect a very few atmospheres of pressure would do it (thinking in terms of the early Atmospheric Engines which had a problem even withstanding one atmosphere.
 
Bystander said:
Yes. Next --- what wood? What stave thickness and radius? What length to diameter?
I've not crunched any numbers, even on a napkin, but I'd bet the ends would implode before the walls. I'm thinking the staves would tend to behave as an arch and support each other.
 
  • Like
Likes Nidum
jackwhirl said:
I've not crunched any numbers, even on a napkin, but I'd bet the ends would implode before the walls. I'm thinking the staves would tend to behave as an arch and support each other.
Yes, I think that is what would happen, exactly as you say.
 
jackwhirl said:
I've not crunched any numbers, even on a napkin, but I'd bet the ends would implode before the walls. I'm thinking the staves would tend to behave as an arch and support each other.
Yes. I think you are right about the flat ends going first. I can't imagine the amount that the water inside would be enough to distort the wood past fracturing. But I guess the wood itself could become compressed so much as to destroy its internal structure. No use as a barrell after the experiment.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top