Where Can I Find a Good Online Master's Program in Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter arvi8689
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Education
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the pursuit of a second PhD in Physics after completing a Doctorate in Biomedical Science. The original poster seeks recommendations for online master's programs in Physics to enhance their knowledge and resume. However, responses highlight concerns regarding the practicality of distance learning in Physics, particularly the necessity of hands-on laboratory experience for a solid experimental foundation. While some suggest that theoretical physics could be taught effectively online, the consensus is that a comprehensive education in Physics requires access to physical labs, which distance learning often lacks. Additionally, there are worries about the oversaturation of the job market with physics PhDs, suggesting that making advanced education more accessible could exacerbate this issue. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the challenges and limitations of pursuing Physics education through online platforms.
arvi8689
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey

I am doing a Doctorate study in Biomedical science in the US. One other field that interests me a lot is Physics. I am planning to do another PhD in Physics and I would like to start building my knowledge and resume for it from now. For doing so I thought of taking up an online masters course in physics which will brush my knowledge of physics as well as improve my resume to apply for phd in physics. Can you suggest me some good places for a distance online MS in physics. I tried searching for it but I couldn't find anything very useful.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
arvi8689 said:
I am doing a Doctorate study in Biomedical science in the US. One other field that interests me a lot is Physics. I am planning to do another PhD in Physics and I would like to start building my knowledge and resume for it from now.

It doesn't make any sense to be that you are getting a second doctorate. Once you have one doctorate, I don't see any point in getting another one.

The hard part about distance learning isn't finding material. It's getting academic credit. If you are in a situation in which you just want to learn stuff and don't care about academic credit, then just use google and amazon.
 
I find distance-education degrees in physics problematic - you really need access to good labs to get a sound experimental background.
 
e.bar.goum said:
I find distance-education degrees in physics problematic - you really need access to good labs to get a sound experimental background.

In fact, if someone really wanted to, I'm pretty sure that you could create a top-notch doctorate program in theoretical physics via distance learning. But no one seems interested in doing that. Right now the system can't handle the 1000 or so physics Ph.D.'s that come out today, and if you make it easier for people to get a Ph.D., you'll end up with even more of a glut.
 
twofish-quant said:
In fact, if someone really wanted to, I'm pretty sure that you could create a top-notch doctorate program in theoretical physics via distance learning.

For sure, but at an undergrad or masters-without-having-first-done-physics level, I really think that having a good experimental background is essential even if you want to be a theoretician. I don't see that being possible for distance learning.
 
e.bar.goum said:
I really think that having a good experimental background is essential even if you want to be a theoretician. I don't see that being possible for distance learning.

Distance learning courses don't and often aren't 100% distance. You can have a course on astrophysics for six months and then spend two weeks of that at an observatory. You could also ship a physics/electronics lab to the student for him to do some simple things.

If you think about the issues, there are ways around them, but no one has an interest in even *trying* to make it easier for people to learn physics, because then we'd have too many physicists for the economy and society to support (and I consider this a problem with the economy and society).
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top