Where Can I Find Beginner-Friendly Books on Relativity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jalo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books Relativity
AI Thread Summary
For first-year college students interested in special and general relativity, several book recommendations cater to varying levels of mathematical understanding. Special relativity can be grasped with basic calculus, algebra, and vectors, making it accessible for beginners. Recommended texts include "A Traveler's Guide to Spacetime" by Thomas A. Moore and "Spacetime Physics" by Taylor and Wheeler. For general relativity, which typically requires knowledge of tensor calculus, "Exploring Black Holes: An Introduction to General Relativity" by Taylor and Wheeler is suggested as it only requires first-year physics and calculus. Lillian R. Lieber's "The Einstein Theory of Relativity" offers an older perspective that is still insightful but lacks modern geometric approaches. For a more rigorous mathematical treatment, Bernard Schutz's "A First Course in General Relativity" is recommended, as it is designed for undergraduates and covers both theories comprehensively. Students are encouraged to start with conceptual descriptions if they find the mathematical approach challenging initially.
Jalo
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
Hello!
I am in my first year in college studying physics. Is there any good book about special & general relativity that I can read, understand and enjoy with my current knowledge? (I have only had a few hours about this theme, but I've loved it, and also understood the basics. I'd like to understand more than the basics tho).

If there's any other book you think I could be interested in, and also understand, feel free to write it down! I find most of physics themes very interesting.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


If you are a first year in College, can you specify what kind of math you know? Do you want a mathematical description, or more of a conceptual description?

Special relativity should be doable in full mathematical rigor even for a first year college student, as long as you are determined. All the math you would need is basic calculus and algebra and vectors.

General relativity requires tensor calculus (differential geometry) to do in full mathematical rigor, which is usually not part of an average first year college student's box of tools. You can still learn some basics of it.

I really enjoyed "The Einstein Theory of Relativity" by Lillian R Lieber. It's an old book (1930's), and so it didn't introduce the tensors and vectors and one forms in a modern more geometrical viewpoint, but it does give you some insight into how GR is actually done. This book describes both the special and general theories in language that should be accessible.

If you want to look at a more modern viewpoint; however, this is not really the book to go to (all the definitions of tensors and one forms are merely statements like "they transform like...").

Of course, with a book like this, you're not going to go into much detail of the theory. I think the most she does for you is derive the Schwarzschild metric. I think it is a good place to start though.
 


For special relativity, I recommend A Traveler's Guide to Spacetime: An Introduction to Special Relativity by Thomas A. Moore and the red edition of Spacetime Physics by Taylor and Wheeler. For general relativity, I recommend Exploring Black Holes: An Introduction to General Relativity by Taylor and Wheeler, which only requires first-year physics and first-year calculus as prerequisites.
 


Matterwave said:
If you are a first year in College, can you specify what kind of math you know? Do you want a mathematical description, or more of a conceptual description?

Special relativity should be doable in full mathematical rigor even for a first year college student, as long as you are determined. All the math you would need is basic calculus and algebra and vectors.

General relativity requires tensor calculus (differential geometry) to do in full mathematical rigor, which is usually not part of an average first year college student's box of tools. You can still learn some basics of it.

I really enjoyed "The Einstein Theory of Relativity" by Lillian R Lieber. It's an old book (1930's), and so it didn't introduce the tensors and vectors and one forms in a modern more geometrical viewpoint, but it does give you some insight into how GR is actually done. This book describes both the special and general theories in language that should be accessible.

If you want to look at a more modern viewpoint; however, this is not really the book to go to (all the definitions of tensors and one forms are merely statements like "they transform like...").

Of course, with a book like this, you're not going to go into much detail of the theory. I think the most she does for you is derive the Schwarzschild metric. I think it is a good place to start though.

I was more interested in a mathematical approach. But if I won't understand it, I guess I will start with a conceptual description and try the mathematical description in a year or two.
I'll look up the books you both said! Thanks!
 
Lillian Lieber's book does have math in it. She goes through a little bit of tensor calculus before describing the curvature tensor, etc.

I just wanted to mention that her approach is the "old" way of approaching tensors whereby you just look at their transformation properties (how their components transform under a general coordinate transformation).

If you want the full-on math, I would suggest Bernard Schutz's "A First Course in General Relativity". Shutz is quite good when it comes to explaining things, and this book is designed for an undergraduate audience. It goes through both special and general relativity. You may have to work at the math a little bit though.
 


George Jones said:
For general relativity, I recommend Exploring Black Holes: An Introduction to General Relativity by Taylor and Wheeler.
I second that, I think this book is a great didactic work.
 
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...

Similar threads

Replies
30
Views
5K
Replies
0
Views
849
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Back
Top