Where can I find more difficult 'versions' of problems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhizKid
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenge of exam questions in calculus courses that are significantly more difficult than textbook problems, leading to student frustration. Participants express that while some questions require cleverness and problem-solving skills beyond the textbook material, they believe students should take responsibility for their learning. There is a request for web resources that provide challenging problems in subjects like math and physics that align with lower-level undergraduate exams. The conversation also touches on the suitability of Spivak's "Calculus" as a supplement for introductory calculus courses, with opinions suggesting it may be more aligned with real analysis but still beneficial for foundational understanding. Recommendations for additional resources include works by Courant, Hardy, Apostol, and Piskunov, with Piskunov's book noted for its accessibility and quality.
PhizKid
Messages
477
Reaction score
2
Like, questions that you would technically be able to solve with very limited knowledge of a particular subject, except that it requires more work/cleverness.

For example in Calc I, I was able to solve every problem for each learned topic given in the textbook rather easily, however on the exams the questions were nothing of the easy nature in the textbook and as such were much, much more difficult and some students complained that they did not learn the material to solve these problems, when in fact they just required extremely tricky knowledge to break through them. Sometimes there are questions we haven't learned, but we are expected to learn some topics on our own due to the limited number of class hours. I have no complaints about that, as I believe in taking my own responsibility.

So the textbook questions being too easy, are there any web resources for different subjects like maths/physics that list extremely difficult problems that don't require advanced knowledge of the subject and can realistically be solved/expected to appear on a lower-level undergraduate exam?

What about Spivak's Calculus for the rest of my Calculus sequence? I'm told it's more of a Real Analysis book, but can it be used as a supplement for introductory Calc II/III courses, especially the problems in the book that might appear in a first year Calculus course?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
try the usual suspects, spivak, courant, hardy, apostol, kitchen, dieudonne'.
 
I can also recommend Piskunov's "Differential and Integral Calculus." You can find the international edition on the cheap. I found it at a library and read through some of it. Nice book.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top