Where can I learn to calculate the need for cooling?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TSN79
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cooling
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding resources for calculating the cooling effects in deep freezers, emphasizing the importance of understanding how factors like food quantity, required temperature, room size, and insulation affect cooling needs. It highlights that heat loss or gain is proportional to the temperature difference between the ambient environment and the refrigerated area. Participants debate the relevance of radiation versus conduction and convection in heat transfer calculations, with some arguing that radiation losses are negligible in this context. The conversation also touches on the practicality of using linear approximations in engineering, suggesting that minor effects can often be ignored for efficiency. Overall, the thread underscores the complexity of thermal dynamics in refrigeration and the need for reliable calculation methods.
TSN79
Messages
422
Reaction score
0
I'm on the lookout for a website dealing with calculation of cooling effects in deep freezers (for food storage and such). The main goal for me is to learn the basics of how to find the needed cooling effect from input values like amount of food, required temperature, room size, insulation, etc. If anyone know any good places I'll be happy :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Google REFRIGERATION CALCULATIONS ...

You could also get empirical information off the back of any freezer...or the owners manual for one...

One thing I can tell you in general: heat loss/gain is directly proportional to the difference in temperature between the ambient and refrigerated area...so keeping something at zero degress in 80 degree ambient takes twice as much cooling (power) as in 40 degree ambient.
 
Naty1 said:
One thing I can tell you in general: heat loss/gain is directly proportional to the difference in temperature between the ambient and refrigerated area...so keeping something at zero degress in 80 degree ambient takes twice as much cooling (power) as in 40 degree ambient.

Saywhatnow?
Stefan-Boltzmann's law:
j^{\star} = \sigma T^{4}

Does that look linear in T to you?
 
That's only for radiation and a refrigerator is almost entirely conduction and convection and is linear.
 
russ_watters said:
That's only for radiation and a refrigerator is almost entirely conduction and convection and is linear.

I know it's for radiation, and at least where I learned to do these kinds of calculations, radiation losses were never neglected.

Conduction is generally treated as if it was linear, but it is not. It's an approximation. The same goes for convection, only it's a worse approximation there.

Using a linear approximation is one thing, stating that reality is linear is something else.
 
alxm said:
I know it's for radiation, and at least where I learned to do these kinds of calculations, radiation losses were never neglected.
That's surprising since radiation really is insignificantly small for this case. A tiny fraction of a percent of the heat transfer.
Conduction is generally treated as if it was linear, but it is not.
I've never heard that before - could you provide a source? Here's the typical description: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/thermo/heatra.html
The same goes for convection, only it's a worse approximation there.
Convection is only approximately linear, but in a situation where you have a lot of insulation, the conduction through the insulation is by far the dominant mode of heat transfer. So again, other nonlinear modes are insignificantly small.
Using a linear approximation is one thing, stating that reality is linear is something else.
I think you are being overly pedantic. When someone is looking for 95% accuracy and an effect is .0001% (estimates), it can safely be ignored. This is an engineering question and one of the more important skills in doing an engineering problem is figuring out what you need to consider and what you can safely ignore. If an engineer tries to consider all effects - no matter how small - in all cases, they'd never finish solving a problem.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top