Where Did I Go Wrong in Simplifying this Algebraic Expression?

uperkurk
Messages
167
Reaction score
0
Simplify -d^2+[9d+(2-4d^2)]

-d^2+[9d+(2-4d^2)]

d^2[-9d-2+4d^2]

d^2+4d^2-9d-2

5d^2-9d-2

but wolfram says the answer is

-5d^2-9d+2

What did I do wrong?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
uperkurk said:
Simplify -d^2+[9d+(2-4d^2)]

-d^2+[9d+(2-4d^2)]

d^2[-9d-2+4d^2]
Here is your error- first, you have dropped the "+" in front of the "[" but that may be just a typo- more importantly you have distributed the "-" in front of d^2 into the [9d+(2- 4d^2). Where you were supposed to have -A+ B, you have A- B.

d^2+4d^2-9d-2

5d^2-9d-2

but wolfram says the answer is

-5d^2-9d+2

What did I do wrong?
 
−d2+[9d+(2−4d2)]

−d2+9d+2−4d2

-5d2 + 9d − 2
 
Without any indication that the 2 in d2 is an exponent, what you have here is close to meaningless.
marie.phd said:
−d2+[9d+(2−4d2)]

−d2+9d+2−4d2

-5d2 + 9d − 2
At a minimum, use ^ to indicate exponents, and = for expressions that are equal, like this:

-d^2 + [9d + (2 − 4d^2)]
= -d^2 + 9d + 2 - 4d^2
= -5d^2 + 9d + 2

Even better is to write exponents that actually look like exponents, using the exponent feature that is available when you click Go advanced.

-5d2 + 9d + 2
 
uperkurk said:
Simplify -d^2+[9d+(2-4d^2)]

-d^2+[9d+(2-4d^2)]
-d^2- 4d^2= -5d^2
You seem to be under the impresion that adding two negatives gives a positive. That is not true. That rule only holds for multiplication and division.

d^2[-9d-2+4d^2]

d^2+4d^2-9d-2

5d^2-9d-2

but wolfram says the answer is

-5d^2-9d+2

What did I do wrong?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top