I'm absolutely and firmly in the squick camp, here. My father and uncles taught me how to partner dance too while I was small enough to stand on their feet and hold onto their hands while we moved around the dance area. And that was at weddings and family gatherings. It was fun.
But this event? Even the wording is designed in such a way to induce major spine shivers.
This event is the perfect opportunity for fathers, grandfathers, uncles, or big brothers to take their special little girl out for a night she will never forget.
Emphasis mine.
Pardon?
And then this:
The night will begin with a momentous photograph of the couple. Dancing, dinner and dessert is included in the $45 per couple registration fee
Emphasis mine.
I realize that, yes, two people constitute a "couple" of people. Within this context, and the context of "dating", which is generally defined as adult or almost-adult pairings enjoying social outings together for the purposes of developing or forming an intimate relationship.
I recognise that they were extending the "Daddy" concept to any older male in the young girl's life, because not all kids have daddies present, so they wouldn't want to exclude anyone. But the whole "couple" "date" wording (and associated photograph) suggests a whole bunch of stuff that's wildly inappropriate. At the very least, they could have thought their presentation through a bit better.
Didn't we have a thread similar to this not too long ago, but it entailed men "dating" their teenaged daughters? Wasn't there some sort of pretext or concept behind it about young women learning from their fathers what proper treatment on a date is supposed to entail?
For whoever in this thread wants to keep insisting that women/girls lie about being sexually assaulted (although why they'd do that, I don't know -- my experience and reading tells me that large numbers of girls and women don't ever tell anyone out of shame, if anything, it continues to be under-reported) they might be interested to hold in their minds that the majority of women under the age of 18 who are sexually assaulted have it happen at the hands of someone known to them. A family member, a friend of the family, a neighbour. The majority of the time, it's not a stranger.
I don't see anything at all wrong with dads and daughters spending exclusive time together doing things they enjoy. I have fond memories of my father spending time with me teaching me stuff and playing with my sister and me. It wasn't formalised or contrived. He just demonstrated that he was interested and wanted to be involved. That meant the world to me.
This event, though? Girls from the ages of 4 to 10 on a "date night"? Nope. That's placing them squarely in an adult oriented context. Four-year-olds don't "date". And they don't "date" their daddies.