Where do I start in math for physics comprehension?

mpatryluk
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
I am looking to work my way through classical physics and into more complex modern physics topics.

I try to learn from a combination of internet resources and textbooks, but on the internet I find them often using terminology which is too mathematically advanced for me.

Some examples are:
-Hilbert space
-Lagrangian/Hamiltonian
-Fourier transforms

And when i try to research these topics online, I don't have the necessary context or experience to understand the vocabulary that explains them, i.e. terminology like "a structure on a set" or other vocabulary that is too vague for me to understand (because I don't have the experience to know which context the words should be taken in).

I've learned up to calculus/trig, and am starting work on linear algebra, but I'd like to know which topics I can study which will give me the math literacy I need to understand concepts like the above mentioned. Ideally resources that introduce me to the vocabulary without presuming prior knowledge.

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
When I went to school, I had Calc 1,2,3, Advanced Calculus, linear algebra and Diff Eqns and that was sufficient to study Classical Mechanics from Marion or from Goldstein, E and M Theory and Quantum Mechanics. For self-study you probably need to study them in that order too as QM depends on some CM and EM concepts.

I also took Tensor Analysis and that helped with the notation.
 
  • Like
Likes mpatryluk
Thank you so much, I'll do it in that order then!
 
For me, the Lagrangisn formulation in CM was the coolest thing I had ever encountered. Consider how you've studied Newtonian physics and used force diagrams and vector math to solve your problems which can get very involved to determine the motion of the system.

It never occurs to you that there is this underlying principle call Least Action that says things move is a way to expend the least amount of energy and from simply accounting for the energy of the system and taking its difference in T-V and doing some math determine the motion. It was very profound for me.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top