Where do the extra particles go

  • Thread starter Thread starter edguy99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles
edguy99
Gold Member
Messages
449
Reaction score
28
Web sites such as http://www.kcvs.ca/martin/phys/phys243/labs/sglab/stern_gerlach.html" explain the effect of a particle going through multiple SG detectors. For example:
sgsmall.gif


If electrons going in the y direction are first measured in the z direction, then the x direction and then again in the z direction, they fail to hit the detector.

Does anyone know what happens to the extra particles that do not hit the last detector? The site speaks of loss of "kinetic energy", but what happens to the particle? Do they simply stop and fall due to gravity? Do they take a hard right or left to miss the detector?

In the case of electrons, there must be substantial charge building up somewhere and in the case of silver atoms, do you scrape them off the insides of the device after each run?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
edguy99 said:
Web sites such as http://www.kcvs.ca/martin/phys/phys243/labs/sglab/stern_gerlach.html" explain the effect of a particle going through multiple SG detectors. For example:
sgsmall.gif


If electrons going in the y direction are first measured in the z direction, then the x direction and then again in the z direction, they fail to hit the detector.

Does anyone know what happens to the extra particles that do not hit the last detector? The site speaks of loss of "kinetic energy", but what happens to the particle? Do they simply stop and fall due to gravity? Do they take a hard right or left to miss the detector?

In the case of electrons, there must be substantial charge building up somewhere and in the case of silver atoms, do you scrape them off the insides of the device after each run?

How is it possible to put particles through an X, Y AND Z? If a Z magnet is oriented vertically then a Y is oriented horizontally and then an X is oriented along the path of travel... How would the particles "get in"?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Perhaps you want to link to the full-sized image, rather than the thumb.
 
maverick_starstrider said:
How is it possible to put particles through an X, Y AND Z? If a Z magnet is oriented vertically then a Y is oriented horizontally and then an X is oriented along the path of travel... How would the particles "get in"?

Full size picture http://www.animatedphysics.com/sterngerlachmachine.gif" . The particle is generated on the left side and comes out with its kinetic energy directly pointed in the Y direction. The SG machine first measures the Z direction causing some particles to go up and some down by tiny amounts (in the mm). Of all the particles that go up, they measure in the X direction and sure enough, this causes half the particles to move slightly towards you and half the particles to move slightly away from you.

The weird thing is this: if you measure again in the Z direction, all the particles stop.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gravity? No. Magnetic field, yes.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
75
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
5K
Back
Top