Where do these expressions for energy densities come from?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the derivation of key expressions related to electromagnetic waves, specifically E=cB, and the energy densities in electric and magnetic fields. The expression E=cB is valid for plane waves in the far-field limit and can be proven using Maxwell's equations. The energy densities for electric and magnetic fields are derived from the electromagnetic field's energy density equation, which can be established through Noether's theorem or by applying Maxwell's equations to formulate the energy-conservation law. It is emphasized that electric and magnetic fields are interconnected and depend on the observer's frame of reference. Understanding these relationships is crucial for grasping classical electromagnetic theory.
Xyius
Messages
501
Reaction score
4
Hello all!
I am getting into the electromagnetic waves section in my optics class and in some of these derivations, they are using expressions that I cannot remember how they were derived or the context of them. My book from my E&M class I took awhile back is currently at my house and I am at my school so I can not look it up. The expressions I am talking about are..

E=cB
Where E and B are the magnitudes of the electric and magnetic fields respectively.

Energy Density in the Electric field
u_{E}=\frac{1}{2}ε_0E^2

Energy Density in the Magnetic field
u_{B}=\frac{1}{2} \frac{1}{μ_0}B^2

Can anyone show where these expressions come from? It would help my understanding a lot! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Everything in classical electromagnetic theory follows from Maxwell's equations or, more elegantly, from the corresponding action principle.

Your first expression is valid for plane waves or in the far-field limit, i.e., at distances from any sources (i.e., charge and current distributions) much larger than the typical wavelength of your em. wave.

To prove it take the Maxwell equations for the free field and look for plane-wave solutions of the form

\vec{E}(t,\vec{x})=\vec{E}_0 \exp(-\mathrm{i} \omega t+\mathrm{i}\vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}),
\vec{B}(t,\vec{x})=\vec{B}_0 \exp(-\mathrm{i}\omega t+\mathrm{i}\vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}).

The other expressions do not make much sense taken separated from each other. There is only an electromagnetic field not an electric and a separated magnetic field. It depends on the frame of reference of the observer, what are electric and magnetic components of the field. In relativity the field-strength components are components of an antisymmetric 2nd-rank tensor.

You find the expression for the energy density of the em. fields with help of Noether's theorem or less systematically by taking the time derivative of the expression,

\epsilon=\frac{\epsilon_0}{2} \vec{E}^2+ \frac{1}{2 \mu_0} \vec{B}^2

and use Maxwell's equation to derive the energy-conservation law in form of a continuity equation. You'll also find that the energy-current density is given by something proportional to the Poynting vector \vec{S}=\vec{E} \times \vec{B}.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top