Where Does Hammer Energy Go When Hitting Wall?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ParamTv
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
When a hammer strikes a rigid wall, the energy supplied by the hammer is not lost but transformed. The wall may not visibly move, but the kinetic energy is converted into heat and sound, affecting the hammer, air, and wall. If the hammer bounces off, some energy remains in the hammer, while vibrations return to the user's body. In contrast, striking a softer material like clay results in energy being used to deform the wall, stopping the hammer. Understanding these energy transformations helps clarify the mechanics of impacts.
ParamTv
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
hello sir i am little confused that when we hammering a rigid wall then where the all energy goes supplied by the hammer act.
example:
suppose i am betting a wall with hammer and there is no effect on wall (mean to say wall is not moving or not creaking). Then tell me where the all energy goes into the wall supplied by the hammer act.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The wall is moving, you just can't see it. Whatever kinetic energy is not conserved will be converted to heat and sound in the hammer/air/wall.
 
If the hammer bounces off the wall then some is still in the hammer.
 
Also, a lot comes back into your own body in the form of vibrations.
 
ParamTv said:
suppose i am betting a wall with hammer and there is no effect on wall (mean to say wall is not moving or not creaking). Then tell me where the all energy goes into the wall supplied by the hammer act.
Sometimes it helps to think of extreme situations.

If the wall is made of soft clay then when you hit it with a hammer the hammer will "thud" into the wall. In that case the KE of the hammer goes into deforming the wall and the hammer stops.

On another extreme if the hammer is made of rubber then the hammer will "bounce" off of the wall. In that case the hammer changes direction but keeps the KE approximately the same overall.

Hopefully you can think of your situation in the context of those extremes.
 
If you've ever used a needle gun(a bunch of little jackhammers), they get extremely hot due to the repeated impacts.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top