B Where Does Momentum Go Near Merging Black Holes?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Filmo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
Filmo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Let's say you start 2 rockets in the opposite direction from a platform that's close to two soon to be merging black holes, the first rocket starts way before the second, but the second will ultimately fly a bit further, before they stop and fly back to towards the black hole(s). When black holes merge, they create new gravity and this gravity is supposed to attract the rockets. The second rocket who is closer to the merged black hole and has more momentum than the first rocket will not make it as far as the first one. This means that the second rocket that had more momentum, is losing some momentum and the first rocket will actually fly back faster. Where has the momentum of the second rocket gone?

But what if gravity doesn't really attract, but it actually increases the momentum and this effect is only visible when new gravity is created?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Filmo said:
When black holes merge, they create new gravity
The merger of black holes does not create new gravity. Heuristically, the gravitation of one merged hole is the same as the combined gravitational effects of two separate holes.

In general relativity, momentum is conserved locally. I am not expert enough to know how this translates into global momentum conservation. Or the extent to which a law of global momentum conservation can even be stated in the context of curved space-time.
 
Last edited:
Filmo said:
Let's say you start 2 rockets in the opposite direction from a platform that's close to two soon to be merging black holes, the first rocket starts way before the second, but the second will ultimately fly a bit further, before they stop and fly back to towards the black hole(s). When black holes merge, they create new gravity and this gravity is supposed to attract the rockets. The second rocket who is closer to the merged black hole and has more momentum than the first rocket will not make it as far as the first one. This means that the second rocket that had more momentum, is losing some momentum and the first rocket will actually fly back faster. Where has the momentum of the second rocket gone?
This post is too much a confusion of ideas to be answerable. There are no black holes in classical physics - so, as an absolute minimum you would need to upgrade your ideas of time, space, momentum and motion from classical to relativistic thinking.
 
  • Like
Likes martinbn, Vanadium 50 and jbriggs444
Filmo said:
When black holes merge, they create new gravity
What does this mean? Are you taking about non-linear parts of the Einstein field equations? If so, can you point a reference to exactly what effects you mean by this?

Momentum is locally conserved, so if any momentum disappears from the matter then it must go into local gravitational waves.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Dale said:
Are you taking about non-linear parts of the Einstein field equations?
Not in a B-level thread, I would imagine!
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
PeroK said:
Not in a B-level thread, I would imagine!
Definitely not! But I cannot think of any other legitimate meaning for the phrase about creating new gravity.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top