Where does the energy disappear to?

  • Thread starter Thread starter IPhO' 2008
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
Electrons and protons generate electric fields with energy, but within an atom, the overall electric field energy appears to vanish. This energy transforms into the binding energy of the atom, allowing work to be done on other systems. The electric field energy is positive, while the binding energy is negative due to the reference state being set at infinite separation of the particles. This negative value indicates that work is required to bring the electron and proton together to form a hydrogen atom. Understanding these energy dynamics is crucial for grasping atomic interactions.
IPhO' 2008
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
When we have electron and proton . Both electron and proton have electric field and electric field has energy.Inside the atom, there are electrons and protons but atom has no electric field.
Why the energy of the electric field disappear?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The energy of the fields becomes the binding energy of the atom i.e. during the binding work can be done on something else.
 
Thank you so much.
 
I have 1 question.
An energy of the electric field has a positive sign (+) . But the binding energy has a negative sign (-).Why?
 
Remember when you first learned about gravitational potential energy that you learned that you could set your h=0 reference point anywhere you wanted, and when you first learned about voltage that you could set your V=0 reference point (ground) anywhere you wanted. This is because only differences in energy have any physical significance and so energies are always implicitly or explicitly with reference to some specified reference state which is arbitrarily given a value of 0 energy. In the case of binding energy the reference state is the unbound constituents, i.e. infinite separation between the various components. The fact that it is negative reflects the fact that e.g. work can be done in bringing an electron and a proton from far away to form a hydrogen atom.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top