Where does the K.E go? [RotMech]

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rohanprabhu
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a boy on a rotating platform who stretches out his hands, thereby doubling the system's moment of inertia. Participants explore the implications of this action on the system's kinetic energy and the conservation of energy principles, particularly in the context of rotational motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant applies conservation of angular momentum to derive the new angular velocity after the boy stretches his hands, concluding that the kinetic energy decreases.
  • Another participant corrects the kinetic energy expressions, emphasizing the need to consider the moment of inertia in the calculations.
  • There is a suggestion that mechanical energy is not conserved due to the work done by the boy in extending his hands.
  • Some participants question where the energy goes when the boy does work, noting that the system's kinetic energy decreases while the boy exerts effort.
  • One participant introduces the concept of non-conservative forces and discusses energy loss in the context of biological systems.
  • Another participant compares the scenario to a spring system, suggesting that energy transformations occur between kinetic and potential forms, but the overall energy is conserved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the conservation of energy in this scenario. While some agree that the work done by the boy affects the system's energy, others challenge the implications of this work and its relationship to the overall energy conservation.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the definitions and implications of rotational potential energy, as well as the assumptions made about external forces and energy transformations in the system.

rohanprabhu
Messages
410
Reaction score
2
Got this question somewhere: A boy is standing on a rotating platform. The system has a kinetic energy 'K'. Now, the boy stretches out is hand such that the Moment of Inertia of the system doubles. What is the Kinetic Energy of the system?

So.. i first applied conservation of angular momentum,

<br /> I\omega_1 = 2I\omega_2<br />

(here, \omega_1 and \omega_2 are the angular velocities before & after he stretches his hands).

So, we have:

<br /> \omega_2 = \frac{\omega_1}{2}<br />

Also,

<br /> K = \frac{1}{2}{\omega_1}^2<br />

and the new kinetic energy is:

<br /> K_2= \frac{1}{2}{\omega_2}^2 = \frac{1}{8}{\omega_1}^2<br />

So, the energy difference is:

<br /> K - K_2 = \frac{3}{8}{\omega_1}^2<br />

So.. where exactly does this energy go? By COE, this needs to be translated to the potential energy.. but does something called 'Rotational Potential Energy' even exist? How do i calculate it if it does?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
erm the kinetic energy of a rotation is 1/2I*w^2
 
rohanprabhu said:
Got this question somewhere: A boy is standing on a rotating platform. The system has a kinetic energy 'K'. Now, the boy stretches out is hand such that the Moment of Inertia of the system doubles. What is the Kinetic Energy of the system?

So.. i first applied conservation of angular momentum,

<br /> I\omega_1 = 2I\omega_2<br />

(here, \omega_1 and \omega_2 are the angular velocities before & after he stretches his hands).

So, we have:

<br /> \omega_2 = \frac{\omega_1}{2}<br />
OK. Let's at least imagine that he's holding weights in his hands or something to give him a bit of rotational inertia to play with.

Also,

<br /> K = \frac{1}{2}{\omega_1}^2<br />
That should be:
K_1 = \frac{1}{2}I{\omega_1}^2
and the new kinetic energy is:

<br /> K_2= \frac{1}{2}{\omega_2}^2 = \frac{1}{8}{\omega_1}^2<br />
That should be:
K_2 = \frac{1}{2}I_2{\omega_2}^2 = \frac{1}{2}( \frac{1}{2}I{\omega_1}^2)


So, the energy difference is:

<br /> K - K_2 = \frac{3}{8}{\omega_1}^2<br />
K_2 = \frac{1}{2} K_1
So.. where exactly does this energy go? By COE, this needs to be translated to the potential energy.. but does something called 'Rotational Potential Energy' even exist? How do i calculate it if it does?
Mechanical energy is not conserved. (Consider the work he must do as he extends his hands.)
 
Doc Al said:
OK. Let's at least imagine that he's holding weights in his hands or something to give him a bit of rotational inertia to play with.

That should be:
K_2 = \frac{1}{2}I_2{\omega_2}^2 = \frac{1}{2}( \frac{1}{2}I{\omega_1}^2)

K_2 = \frac{1}{2} K_1

Mechanical energy is not conserved. (Consider the work he must do as he extends his hands.)

umm.. right.. i made that slip there.. it's not 1/4th but half of the K.E. but that apart, you mean to say that the work done by the boy to move his hands apart equals the difference [taking the general assumptions of no air friction and such] of the 2 kinetic energies? So, if he brings his hands back together, the work done will translate into kinetic energy again and bring it back to the previous kinetic energy 'K'.

But here, the boy has done work.. but still the system remains unchanged. Where does the energy consumed by the boy go?

By Work energy theorem, the change in Kinetic energy is given by the total work done. Which means, the work done in this case is zero??

Could somebody please clarify this a little bit..
 
well, in that case, i guess the boy applied two non-conservative forces, making the system to apparently(literally) conserve itself...

Whoever, energy was lost to the boy make that movements. In general, Men system are non conservative, as it was a great process to make him move(or being alive), heat is only one of the K.E. lost...
 
rohanprabhu said:
umm.. right.. i made that slip there.. it's not 1/4th but half of the K.E. but that apart, you mean to say that the work done by the boy to move his hands apart equals the difference [taking the general assumptions of no air friction and such] of the 2 kinetic energies? So, if he brings his hands back together, the work done will translate into kinetic energy again and bring it back to the previous kinetic energy 'K'.

But here, the boy has done work.. but still the system remains unchanged. Where does the energy consumed by the boy go?

By Work energy theorem, the change in Kinetic energy is given by the total work done. Which means, the work done in this case is zero??

Could somebody please clarify this a little bit..
When he brings his hands back, he makes mechanical work to the system, which then increases its kinetic energy; when he let's his hands moving apart, the work he makes on the system is negative, that is, the system makes work on him.

Think of a stretched spring connected with the two masses: when the spring is released and can contract making the massess approach, its previous elastic potential energy is converted into system's kinetic energy; if you instead had a non-stretched spring, then centrifugal force makes it stretch and system's kinetic energy is converted into spring potential energy.
(There are no tricks! Energy is neither created nor destroyed!)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K