Frequency of a proton moving in a circular orbit

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the frequency of a proton moving in a circular orbit, particularly in the context of relativistic effects and cyclotron frequency. Participants explore the relationship between kinetic energy, velocity, and frequency, questioning the validity of classical equations in a relativistic framework.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine the relationship between velocity and frequency, considering both classical and relativistic perspectives. There is an exploration of the implications of kinetic energy on frequency and radius, with some questioning the assumptions made regarding the proton's motion and the applicability of certain equations.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing examination of the equations and assumptions involved in the problem. Some participants have offered corrections to previous calculations, while others are questioning the implications of relativistic effects on frequency and radius. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, indicating a productive discussion without explicit consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of distinguishing between non-relativistic and relativistic scenarios, particularly regarding the mass of the proton and the behavior of frequency as kinetic energy increases. There are references to specific values and equations that may not be universally agreed upon, highlighting the complexity of the topic.

Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53

Homework Statement



upload_2017-12-26_17-36-32.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



[/B]Assuming that the relation ## v = \omega r ## is valid in relativistic calculation.

As the speed is greater for higher kinetic energy, ## \omega_2 ## is greater.

This is shown by only (d). So, I think (d) should be the correct answer.


## K.E._2 = (\gamma_2 -1) m_p c^2 = m_p c^2 ##

## v_2 = \frac { \sqrt{ 3}} 2 c ##

Similarly, ## v_1 = 0.6 c ##

## \frac { \omega_1}{\omega_2} = \frac { v_1}{v_2} = \frac { 1.2}{\sqrt{ 3}} ##

Is this correct?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-26_17-36-32.png
    upload_2017-12-26_17-36-32.png
    11.3 KB · Views: 1,047
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is not correct. Look up "cyclotron frequency" and take the appropriate ratio.
 
qvB = ## \frac { mv^2} r ##

## \frac { v} r = \frac { qB} m ##

So, the frequency is constant (independent of kinetic energy of the proton). Hence, the answer is option (a).

But then, v is different. Does it mean that r increases as v increases, that r is not constant?

Is this correct?
 
Pushoam said:
So, the frequency is constant (independent of kinetic energy of the proton).
Only if the proton is non-relativistic and ##m## is the rest mass. Is this the case here?
 
kuruman said:
Only if the proton is non-relativistic and ##m## is the rest mass. Is this the case here?

The proton's kinetic energy reaches to its rest mass energy. So, the calculation is relativistic.Classically, ## \frac { mv^2} r = qvB ## ...(1)

Relativistically,

## \vec F = \frac { d(\gamma m \vec v )}{dt} = \frac { d(\gamma)}{dt} m \vec v + \gamma \frac { d(m \vec v )}{dt} ##

## = \gamma ^3 \frac { v \dot v}{c^2} mv ~\hat \phi + \gamma \frac { mv^2} r (~ - \hat r) ## ...(2)Now, the ## ~\hat \phi ## component increase the speed, but it does not have any role in calculating frequency.

## \gamma \frac { mv^2} r = qvB ## ...(3)

Assuming ## v = \omega r ## ...(4)

## \omega = \frac { q B}{\gamma m} ## ...(5)

## \frac { \omega_1}{\omega_2} = \frac { \gamma _2}{\gamma _1} = \frac {0.5 }{0.8} = \frac 5 8 ## ...(6)

But if ## v = \omega r ## is valid, then why ## \frac { \omega_1}{\omega_2} \neq \frac { v_1}{v_2} ## ?

Is ## r_1 \neq r_2 ## ?

Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
Pushoam said:
Is ## r_1 \neq r_2## ?
Yes. The proton spirals out as it gains energy.
Also, I don't know where you got the ##\gamma## values in equation (6), but I know that ##\gamma## is always greater than or equal to 1. To find ##\gamma##, I would use the relativistic kinetic energy expression, ##K=(\gamma-1)m_0c^2##.
 
kuruman said:
I don't know where you got the γγ\gamma values in equation (6), but I know that γγ\gamma is always greater than or equal to 1.

The following is wrong. While doing calculation, I took ## \gamma = \sqrt { 1 - \frac {v^2}{c^2}} ## instead of ## \frac 1 {\sqrt { 1 - \frac {v^2}{c^2}}} ##.
Pushoam said:
## \frac { \omega_1}{\omega_2} = \frac { \gamma _2}{\gamma _1} = \frac {0.5 }{0.8} = \frac 5 8 ## ...(6)
The correcct one is ## \frac { \omega_1}{\omega_2} = \frac { \gamma _2}{\gamma _1} = \frac {\frac 1 {0.5 }} {\frac 1 {0.8}} = \frac 8 5 ##

So, the frequency decreases as kinetic energy increases.
 
Right. In classical mechanics speed and radius change at the same rate, but relativistic the radius increases more (and the velocity is limited of course), so the frequency goes down with increasing energy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pushoam

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K