garylau
- 70
- 3
Moved from a technical forum, so homework template missing
The discussion revolves around the origin of the angle pi/4 in a line integral, specifically in section 3 of the problem. Participants are exploring the context of spherical coordinates and the implications of using different coordinate systems for the integral.
Participants are actively questioning the assumptions regarding the angles and coordinate systems. Some hints have been provided regarding the use of cylindrical coordinates for certain parts of the problem, but there is no explicit consensus on the interpretation of the angle pi/4.
There are indications of confusion regarding the conventions of angles in spherical coordinates, particularly whether the definitions align with standard practices. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the angle's appropriateness in the given context.
in section 3vanhees71 said:Hm, I don't know what ##\theta## is. Also this should be posted in the home-work section of these forums. Thus I give only a hint:
I'd only do the quarter circle in cylindrical coordinates. All other parts of the path are very easily done in Cartesian ones. To give more specific hints, I'd need to know the conventions used concerning the angles (are ##\theta## and ##\phi## interchanged compared to the standard choice of spherical coordinates with ##\theta## the polar and ##\phi## the azimuthal angle?).
You're right. It's a mistake.garylau said:Where is pi/4 coming from in the line integral(section 3)?
because i think it should be 1/2=tan(theta) which theta is 26.5651...