B Where is the error in my reasoning about palindromes?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the probability of forming palindromes with two and three letters. The original poster mistakenly believes that two-letter palindromes are less likely due to needing the same letter in both positions, resulting in 26 possibilities. However, the reasoning fails to account for the total number of combinations for three-letter words, which includes a middle letter that does not affect the palindrome structure. The key point is that while there are 26 two-letter palindromes, the probability calculations for three-letter palindromes need to consider the total combinations of letters accurately. Understanding the relationship between the number of palindromic combinations and total letter combinations clarifies the error in reasoning.
red65
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
1672170106596.png

Hello everyone, I found this problem online about probability, for me, I think that to have a 2 letter palindrome is less likely because we need to have the same letter in the 2 places which gives us 26 possibilities (aa , bb, cc ....) however for words with 3 letters we have 26 possibilities for the first and the last letter times 26 possibilities for the letter in the middle (aaa,aba,aca....) unfortunately my answer is wrong, can anyone tell me where is the mistake in my reasoning?
thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
red65 said:
Hello everyone, I found this problem online about probability, for me, I think that to have a 2 letter palindrome is less likely because we need to have the same letter in the 2 places which gives us 26 possibilities (aa , bb, cc ....) however for words with 3 letters we have 26 possibilities for the first and the last letter times 26 possibilities for the letter in the middle (aaa,aba,aca....) unfortunately my answer is wrong, can anyone tell me where is the mistake in my reasoning?
thanks!
Not all possibilities are equally likely. In particular, ##aa## is 26 times more likely than ##aaa##. But ##aa## has the same likelihood as ##a*a##, where ##*## is any letter.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes malawi_glenn and red65
The middle letteer doesn't matter (3 letter word). Drop it and get the same as 2 letter word.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913
red65 said:
can anyone tell me where is the mistake in my reasoning?
For 2 letter words you are right that there are 26 possibilities so we have ## P(\text{palindrome}) = \frac{26}{Y} ##. What is Y? For 3 letter words you are right that the number on the top is 26 x 26, but what is the number on the bottom?
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and FactChecker
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top