Where is the mistake in this derivation of Length Contraction?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a derivation of the length contraction formula using a thought experiment involving photons in a moving box. Participants explore the assumptions and calculations involved in the derivation, focusing on the implications of simultaneity and the geometry of the situation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a derivation of the length contraction formula, suggesting an alternative formula that incorporates terms involving velocity and the speed of light.
  • Another participant requests the derivation to be shown clearly, emphasizing the use of LaTeX for clarity.
  • Several participants highlight the importance of considering the relativity of simultaneity in the derivation.
  • One participant provides a detailed breakdown of the calculations for a specific velocity, outlining the paths of the photons and the distances traveled.
  • Another participant challenges the initial assumptions made in the calculations, pointing out a potential error in the reasoning regarding the distances traveled by the photons and the emitter.
  • A later reply acknowledges the error and expresses gratitude for the clarification, indicating a refinement of the original argument.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correctness of the initial derivation. There are competing views regarding the assumptions made, particularly concerning the simultaneity of events and the distances involved in the calculations.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings of the geometry involved in the thought experiment and the implications of simultaneity on the calculations. Some mathematical steps remain unresolved or unclear, contributing to the ongoing debate.

aliinuur
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I've got L=L_0*sqrt(1+v^2/c^2)-v^2/c^2 instead of L=L_0*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2). Where did i make mistake?
squareClock.png
I tried to use square box with two perpendicularly oscillating photons to derive length contraction formula. Photons are emitted, reflected from box walls and absorbed simultaneously from the box's point of view. If the box have some velocity v, then assuming photons are still emitted and absorbed(but not reflected) simultaneously, I've got L=L_0*sqrt(1+v^2/c^2)-v^2/c^2 instead of L=L_0*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2). Where did I make mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Difficult to tell if you don't show your derivation.

Note that you can use ##\LaTeX## to lay out maths legibly. (If it wasn't working when you wrote your first post it should be now because I've used LaTeX - refresh the page if you still don't see it rendered.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50 and Dale
WhatsApp Image 2024-10-06 at 20.39.38_6c1e5945.jpg

here is my calculations for v=c/2. Diagonal arrows - path of the vertical photon, horizontal arrows - path of the horizontal photon, both photons travel distance 2*R=2*L*sqrt(1+1/4). I find contracted length by subtracting x1(path of the emitter when horizontal photon hits the wall) from the path of horizontal particle when it hits the wall.
 
Ibix said:
Difficult to tell if you don't show your derivation.

Note that you can use ##\LaTeX## to lay out maths legibly. (If it wasn't working when you wrote your first post it should be now because I've used LaTeX - refresh the page if you still don't see it rendered.)
i've posted my derivation as reply above
 
aliinuur said:
i've posted my derivation as reply above
Images are not acceptable for this. Please use the PF LaTeX feature to post equations directly.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
Don't use a specific ##v## - you can always put a number in later.

Let's say it takes time ##T## for the pulses to return. The vertical pulse travels the same distance on both legs, which must therefore be ##cT/2##. The box travels distance ##vT/2## horizontally and is ##L_0## across. Therefore Pythagoras tells us that ##(cT/2)^2=(vT/2)^2+(L_0)^2##, or $$T^2=\frac{(2L_0)^2}{c^2-v^2}$$
Now consider the horizontally propagating pulse. It doesn't travel the same distance in the positive and negative directions. If the box has length ##L##, what time does the reflection happen? And then what time does the return happen?

Quote or reply to my post to see how I used LaTeX. It's easy enough to learn.
 
(1) As others have said, please post your derivation in a form that is easy to understand. You asked for help; make it easy for people to help you.

(2) Label all events.

(3) Did you correctly consider the relativity of simultanety?
 
Ibix said:
Don't use a specific ##v## - you can always put a number in later.

Let's say it takes time ##T## for the pulses to return. The vertical pulse travels the same distance on both legs, which must therefore be ##cT/2##. The box travels distance ##vT/2## horizontally and is ##L_0## across. Therefore Pythagoras tells us that ##(cT/2)^2=(vT/2)^2+(L_0)^2##, or $$T^2=\frac{(2L_0)^2}{c^2-v^2}$$
Now consider the horizontally propagating pulse. It doesn't travel the same distance in the positive and negative directions. If the box has length ##L##, what time does the reflection happen? And then what time does the return happen?

Quote or reply to my post to see how I used LaTeX. It's easy enough to learn.
WhatsApp Image 2024-10-06 at 23.26.16_428ec73e.jpg

Here, v=c/2.
1. When the vertical photon (photon V) hits ceiling of the box, thus traveling distance R, the emitter travels distance $$\frac{L_0}{2}$$ along the x-axis, the horizontal photon (photon H) also travels distance R along the x-axis, so that it is P-distance ahead of where it must meet the emitter to be absorbed with photon V simultaneously.
2. Photon V is reflected and travels one more distance R to meet the emitter at $$x=L_0$$ . Photon H must be reflected after some distance D and return to the emitter at $$x=L_0$$ traveling overall distance R, thus R=P+2D.
3. It turns out that $$D=\frac{L_0}{2}$$ .
4. Contracted Length L = (x-position of photon H) subtract (x-position of the emitter) when photon H hits the wall. So photon H travels distance D and hits the wall, while the emitter travels distance D/2 (since v=c/2), so x-position of the emitter is $$x_1= \frac{L_0}{2}+\frac{D}{2}$$ while photon H position is $R+D$ .
5. Expressing R, D, P, x1 by $$L_0$$ I've got $$L=L_0(\sqrt{1+\frac{1}{4}}-\frac{1}{4})$$
 
aliinuur said:
View attachment 351919
Here, v=c/2.
1. When the vertical photon (photon V) hits ceiling of the box, thus traveling distance R, the emitter travels distance $$\frac{L_0}{2}$$ along the x-axis
No - if the box travels a distance ##L_0/2## at ##c/2## then the light pulse must have travelled ##L_0##, which is not far enough to have reached the top of the box if it was travelling diagonally. The pulse will not reflect at the time you say. See the calculation in my last post.

I haven't checked the rest of your work, but the error in the first line will propagate through it, I'm afraid.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: aliinuur
  • #10
yeah, here is my wrong. Thanks!!!!!!!!! Now it fits perfectly!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
4K
  • · Replies 166 ·
6
Replies
166
Views
15K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
6K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K