Is Knight a good book?Dexter K said:I used Physics for Scientists and Engineers by Randall Knight. I've heard great things about Young and Freedman. Based on most amazon reviews, Tipler is middle of the road. I used Knight to study for engineering physics exemption exams (self-study) and I passed both Mechanics and E&M (somehow). Y&F has some very tough problems which will definitely benefit you later down the road.
It ultimately depends on the individual's learning style and preferences. Some may find Young's "University Physics" to be more rigorous and comprehensive, while others may prefer Tipler's "Physics for Scientists and Engineers" for its more conceptual approach.
Both books are commonly used as introductory textbooks for physics courses, so either one can be suitable for beginners. However, Young's "University Physics" may be more challenging for those without a strong math background.
Both books have high-quality visuals and illustrations to aid in understanding complex concepts. However, Tipler's "Physics for Scientists and Engineers" may have a slight edge in this aspect.
While both books cover the fundamental principles of physics, there may be slight differences in the depth and organization of the content. Tipler's "Physics for Scientists and Engineers" may have a more modern approach and include more recent developments in the field.
Both books are commonly used in universities, so it is difficult to determine which one is more widely used. However, Young's "University Physics" may be more popular in certain regions or institutions.